Daniel,
Could you also send an email to announce@ and users@ like described in [1]?
Same for maven-shade-plugin and maven-remote-resources
Thanks,
Vincent
[1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/releasing.html
2008/3/20, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This vote passes:
+1
This vote passes:
+1 binding: jvanzyl, brianf, olamy, vsiveton
+1 non-binding: jdillon, mtalevi, dkulp
Thanks!
Dan
On Monday 17 March 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The
+1
Vincent
2008/3/17, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the result of discussions and testing around:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the result of discussions and testing around:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-32
Many thanks to David Jencks for leading that up with
+1
On 17-Mar-08, at 8:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the result of discussions and testing
around:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:06 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release apache-jar-resource-bundle version 1.4
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version
+1
--
Olivier
2008/3/17, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the result of discussions and testing around:
+1
Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the result of discussions and testing around:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRRESOURCES-32
Many thanks to David Jencks
Does this bundle have the same bits as the legal-bundle from genesis
does?
--jason
On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:05 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
To comply with the latest requirements discussed on legal-discuss, we
need a new version of the apache-jar-resource-bundle.
The only change is really the