[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8?page=comments#action_39773 ]
David Jencks commented on MEV-8:
Since there are non-sun freely available implementations of many of these specs
I would prefer to see the provenance (Sun) for these particular impleme
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8?page=comments#action_39772 ]
Trygve Laugstol commented on MEV-8:
---
I'd also like to see all of these under the "java." or
"javax." groupIds. With this it will follow our own guidelines for
groupId naming.
> Upl
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8?page=comments#action_39771 ]
Carlos Sanchez commented on MEV-8:
--
I'd like to see the APIs under the same group, something like "sun" for sun
created jars or "jcp" for jsrs, instead of having one group for each ap
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8?page=comments#action_39766 ]
Brett Porter commented on MEV-8:
I have done:
activation
javamail
jdo
jca
jdbc-stdext
jta
> Upload Sun POMs for non redistributable jars
>
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8?page=comments#action_39661 ]
Carlos Sanchez commented on MEV-8:
--
Yes, some are already, we just need to "evangelize" about them and add the
package tag.
> Upload Sun POMs for non redistributable jars
> -
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-8?page=comments#action_39659 ]
Brett Porter commented on MEV-8:
many of these are already there (activation, jdbc, jms, javamail) - please use
those as a basis
I believe servletapi to be redistributable as it comes
