[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1978?page=comments#action_56639 ]
David Boden commented on MNG-1978:
--
it's because your dependencies don't know anything about your environment, so
cannot assume it is provided.
That's a fair comment for some use
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1978?page=comments#action_56627 ]
Brett Porter commented on MNG-1978:
---
moved to docs to document the reason given in the first comment
Provided scope transitive dependencies required + exclude dependencies for
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1978?page=comments#action_56563 ]
John Casey commented on MNG-1978:
-
why is this listed under the documentation-faqs component? isn't this a
question about scope-handling, something that should be assigned to something
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1978?page=comments#action_56366 ]
Stephen Duncan Jr commented on MNG-1978:
If it can't be assumed to be provided transitively, then shouldn't it be
treated as if it's compile scope for the transitive case?
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1978?page=comments#action_56372 ]
Brett Porter commented on MNG-1978:
---
if it is for the exclusion from the webapp, then that needs to be a feature of
that plugin
Provided scope transitive dependencies required +
