[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-660?page=comments#action_43624 ]
Brett Porter commented on MNG-660:
--
yes, if that provides the methods necessary. Note that Emmanuel has recently
been simpifying the provider interface so that it may also be sufficient.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-660?page=comments#action_43623 ]
Vincent Siveton commented on MNG-660:
-
Brett,
Do you think it is a good idea to use the
${component.org.apache.maven.scm.manager.ScmManager}" in the ScmReport class to
handle scm re
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-660?page=comments#action_43505 ]
Yann Le Du commented on MNG-660:
Erratum on my previous comment :
[...] As a matter of fact, if I omit the second 'svn:', the generated Project
Info [...]
> Project info reports plugin
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-660?page=comments#action_43504 ]
Yann Le Du commented on MNG-660:
The duplicate svn is on purpose. As described in
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/scm/scmurl.html, the first one is for
the provider and the sec
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-660?page=comments#action_43502 ]
Nicolas Chalumeau commented on MNG-660:
---
There is no bug here you have a duplicate svn :
scm:svn:svn://host:3691/COMMON/trunk/commonframework/
Correct is :
scm:svn://host:3691
