The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Wed, 5 May 2004 8:18 PM
Body:
Thanks for the tests. I can add some checks on the xml similar to the tests in the ear
plugin.
-
View
Hi
I don't think (excuse me all for giving my opinion like this being
so unknown) supporting eclipse plugins directy should be added to maven.
This would be a lot of work and little payoff. I think that the current
plugin shuold be improved to support all data for .project and
.classpath (pr
I submited a patch that adds tests for the builders and natures,
I made the tests separated because I think that the test shuold include
some validation over the expected contents of the generated file
I don't know how to do this with jelly yet...
Miguel Griffa wrote:
I'll go for the test case n
I'll go for the test case now,
I'm sorry, but being newbie is a bit unfamiliar for me testing maven plugin
I'll submit a patch for the test case if I manage to get one :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Tue, 4 May 2
Hi all,
Regardless of this patche fixing the bug or not, I think we could go a
step further on the Eclipse project/nature/builder support. Let me
explain better.
For the case of 'less intrusive' Eclipse plugins (like Checkstyle), I
think the patch is fine. But that is not enough for plugins th
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: dion gillard
Created: Tue, 4 May 2004 9:04 PM
Body:
This patch looks ok to me. It would be nice if we had a test case for it, but I can
apply and test if everyone is ok with it
