11 - 0. Carried.
I will create this from the Maven 1 sources.
- Brett
Brett Porter wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
>over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
>some proposed alternatives.
>
>Here is what I propose
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
+1
> Hi,
>
> I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
> over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
> some proposed alternatives.
>
> Here is what I propose we do:
> - create https://svn.apache.org/r
[X] +1 - I agree with this plan
fabrizio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] +1 - I agree with this plan
[ ] +0 - I will accept this plan, but still prefer an alternate solution
[ ] -1 - I disagree with this plan
Emmanuel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1
On 9/26/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
> over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
> some proposed alternatives.
>
> Here is what I propose we do:
> - create https://svn.ap
[X] +1 - I agree with this plan
[ ] +0 - I will accept this plan, but still prefer an alternate solution
[ ] -1 - I disagree with this plan
Arnaud
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
| over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
| some proposed alternatives.
|
| Here is what I propose we do:
| - creat
+1
Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
some proposed alternatives.
Here is what I propose we do:
- create https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/jxr/trunk
Sounds very good +1
Vincent
2005/9/25, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
> over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
> some proposed alternatives.
>
> Here is what I propose we do:
> - cr
+1
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 09:22 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
> over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
> some proposed alternatives.
>
> Here is what I propose we do:
> - create https://s
Brett Porter wrote:
>[X] +1 - I agree with this plan
>[ ] +0 - I will accept this plan, but still prefer an alternate solution
>[ ] -1 - I disagree with this plan
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
>
>
>>Vote closes in 72 hours. Majority rules. Votes by committers are binding.
>>
>>
>
>Just wondering, are you really allowed to say that committers have
>binding votes?
>
>
It's only for releases that the PMC must hold the binding votes, and
that there must be 3.
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 09:22 +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
> over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
> some proposed alternatives.
>
> Here is what I propose we do:
> - create https://svn.a
Hi,
I polled on this last week. The general feeling was in favour of Maven
over Commons. Some reservations about maintaining another library, and
some proposed alternatives.
Here is what I propose we do:
- create https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/jxr/trunk as an
independant library, as is
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
