DOH! Forgot about MNG-2127...guess the new RC will have to wait until
tomorrow, anyway.
Brett, do you have the ability to fix/test that soon, or should I try to
find a windows environment I can use?
Thanks,
John
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Still playing with this rc with multiproject builds w
this should be fixed in SVN. As soon as I've verified that MNG-2124 is
fixed as well (should be *very* shortly now), I'll put together a new RC
and call a new vote...unless anyone else has any objections? BTW, I've
moved MNG-1797 off of the 2.0.3 radar, since the general sentiment seems
to be t
This should go into JIRA as a blocker on 2.0.3 to make sure we keep
track of it properly.
There was another 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2 regression filed that I just put in as
a blocker. IT might be dismissed with investigation, but I'd like this
to be the release where all those are cleared up so I slotted it
error
>>> is very irritating. Carlos made this patch one month ago.
>>> Please apply it for 2.0.3.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> - Original Message - From: "John Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "Maven Developers Li
Still playing with this rc with multiproject builds with a flat
layout: after the DefaultModelInheritanceAssembler fix everything work
as expected but I got my website broken due to a different behaviour
during publishing.
In my root module the website root directory is /x/htdocs. With the
previou
John, please send a link to your latest build with MNG-1797 fixed when
available so I can test it and vote.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 4:16 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt
> > is very irritating. Carlos made this patch one month ago.
> > Please apply it for 2.0.3.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "John Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Maven Developers List"
> > Sent:
0.3.
Greg
- Original Message - From: "John Casey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt)
This is the newest RC binary, including Kenney's fixes for MNG-1
y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Developers List"
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt)
This is the newest RC binary, including Kenney's fixes for MNG-1317 and
MNG-1318, along with
+0, I didn't test it.
Arnaud
On 3/3/06, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, John Casey wrote:
>
> +1 (2nd time :))
>
>
> > This is the newest RC binary, including Kenney's fixes for MNG-1317 and
> > MNG-1318, along with the fix for the NPE noted earlier in
> > Defa
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, John Casey wrote:
+1 (2nd time :))
> This is the newest RC binary, including Kenney's fixes for MNG-1317 and
> MNG-1318, along with the fix for the NPE noted earlier in
> DefaultModelInheritanceAssembler.
>
> http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2
This is the newest RC binary, including Kenney's fixes for MNG-1317 and
MNG-1318, along with the fix for the NPE noted earlier in
DefaultModelInheritanceAssembler.
http://maven.zones.apache.org/~maven/builds/branches/maven-2.0.x/m2-20060303.193236.tar.gz
Enjoy,
John
John Casey wrote:
Hello
I'm on it.
It'll be fixed in a few minutes, and I'll republish the next CI binary
that comes out as a new RC.
Thanks for catching this.
-john
Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
mh, I got a NPE from maven-project using this build (multiproject
build, flat structure, any goal that requires dependency r
On 3/3/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have a sample project that reproduce the problem?
You can checking out http://svn.magnolia.info/svn/magnolia/trunk/ (the
root project is magnolia-project).
You will still get this error when trying to run a mvn install from
the root p
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Looking at the source, the only way this can go wrong
is if the 'parent path' has no tokens, i.e. is an empty
string, or has the value "http://"; or "file:///". The parent path
in question here is the site url.
This, in combination with '..' in the chil
Do you have a sample project that reproduce the problem?
Emmanuel
Fabrizio Giustina a écrit :
mh, I got a NPE from maven-project using this build (multiproject
build, flat structure, any goal that requires dependency resolution).
Looks like a problem with the changes for MNG-2006 , worths a che
+1
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:48 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [vote] Release Maven 2.0.3 (second attempt)
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, y
Jesse McConnell wrote:
+1
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mh, I got a NPE from maven-project using this build (multiproject
build, flat structure, any goal that requires dependency resolution).
Looks like a problem with the changes for MNG-2006 , worths a check
fabrizio
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
---
+1 (tested)
Vincent
2006/3/2, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Are people testing this release candidate before voting +1? There have
> been previous point releases with major bugs that would have come to
> light before the release if people had actually tested the binary first
> and I hope ot
Are people testing this release candidate before voting +1? There have
been previous point releases with major bugs that would have come to
light before the release if people had actually tested the binary first
and I hope others aside from myself learned from that mistake. I plan
on holding off
+1
On 3/2/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
> 2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
> decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
>
> http://www.nab
big +1 this time
fabrizio
On 3/2/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
> 2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
> decision on the release. The full discussion can be found
+1
I'll kick in a non-binding one :)
On 3/2/06, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> John Casey wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
> > 2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
> > deci
+1
John Casey wrote:
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t116
+1
Emmanuel
John Casey a écrit :
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Mav
+1
John Casey wrote:
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t116
Hello everyone,
If you've been tracking the thread calling for the release of Maven
2.0.3, you'll know that several issues came up which have delayed any
decision on the release. The full discussion can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote-Release-Maven-2.0.3-t1166489.html#a3063584
At
28 matches
Mail list logo
