Brett Porter wrote, On 8/8/2005 5:15 PM:
Hi,
Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
Here it is in summary, elaborated into a bit more detail:
1) create [EMAIL PROTECTED], scm-commits, wagon-commits,
continuum-
Ok, I have put this forward to apmail as suggested.
We can later discuss moving JIRA, repository, etc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would
like to keep them named commits@ to be consistent with other Apache lists.
- Brett
-
To unsubscr
+1
On 8/8/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
> projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
>
> Here it is in summary, elaborated into a bit more detail:
>
> 1) create [EMAIL PROTECTED], scm-commits
Here are some comments from someone who is not a Maven developer but
still subscribes to the dev list.
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
Here it is in summary, elaborated into a bi
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: mardi 9 août 2005 02:16
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: [vote] rearrange commits lists
>
> Hi,
>
> Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
> pr
+1
Arnaud
On 8/9/05, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
> > projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
> >
> > Here it is in summary, ela
+1 from me
Emmanuel
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
Here it is in summary, elaborated into a bit more detail:
1) create [EMAIL PROTECTED], scm-commits, wagon-commits,
continuum-
+1
On 8/9/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
> projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
>
> Here it is in summary, elaborated into a bit more detail:
>
> 1) create [EMAIL PROTECTED], scm-commit
Right, maybe commits is more appropriate for this. I do like the current
visibility.
Either that, or send them all directly to Carlos. He's been a machine -
just awesome :)
- Brett
Kenney Westerhof wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>+0.9
>
>I'm not entirely sure if the REPOCLEAN
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
+0.9
I'm not entirely sure if the REPOCLEAN stuff should go to the dev list.
Could fit in with the MEV jira list (which ends up in maven-dev), although
I don't think non-committers are very interested in those. But creating
another list for repoclean will i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
| projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
|
| Here it is in summary, elaborated into a bit more detail:
|
| 1) create [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:15:41AM +1000, Brett Porter wrote:
[snip]
> Please vote:
+1
[snip]
--
Trygve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Alan proposed we use the standard that is used when setting up Apache
projects these days (we're still on our 2003 setup).
Here it is in summary, elaborated into a bit more detail:
1) create [EMAIL PROTECTED], scm-commits, wagon-commits,
continuum-commits
2) subscribe everyone on [EMAIL PROT
13 matches
Mail list logo