Binding +1: Brett, Jason, Emmanuel, Lukas,
Committer +1: Milos, Fabrizio, Vincent S
User +1: Gordon, Jesse K
Carlos highlighted a regression (fixed), but didn't vote.
Brett Porter wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has change somewhat.
Vote open for 7
+1
Vincent
2006/5/1, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and 2.0-20060501.172351-2
(r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira
I've tested it with the book code and found a regression from 2.1.3
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSUREFIRE-100
I got that two test failures in the whole spring build
On 5/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has c
+1
fabrizio
On 5/1/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and 2.0-20060501.172351-2
(r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
--
+1
-Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and 2.0-20060501.172351-2
(r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/R
Jesse Kuhnert: +1 (non-binding)
On 5/2/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
> Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
> has change somewhat.
>
> Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
> maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.1
+1
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and 2.0-20060501.172351-2
(r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/sec
+1
Milos
On 5/1/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 1 May 06, at 1:29 PM 1 May 06, Brett Porter wrote:
> Please test this as much as you can first, given that the
> classloader has change somewhat.
>
> Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
> maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.17235
+1
On 1 May 06, at 1:29 PM 1 May 06, Brett Porter wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the
classloader has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and
2.0-20060501.172351-2 (r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http
Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Woohoo! +1 (non-binding)
Just don't forget to strip out that isSnapshot() call on the
surefire-2.0 branch… :)
If it's the one I'm thinking of, it can (should) stay.
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Woohoo! +1 (non-binding)
Just don't forget to strip out that isSnapshot() call on the
surefire-2.0 branch… :)
— G
On May 1, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the
classloader has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
Please test this as much as you can first, given that the classloader
has change somewhat.
Vote open for 72 hours, based on:
maven-surefire-plugin 2.2-20060501.172356-2 and 2.0-20060501.172351-2
(r398639)
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11148&s
12 matches
Mail list logo
