-tf3231437s177
.html#a8979318
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jochen Kuhnle
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 5:57 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Required declaration of properties in pom.xml
On 2007-07-10 13:04:50 +0200, Kenney Westerhof
On 2007-07-10 13:04:50 +0200, Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
currently, Maven does not require declaration of properties used in the
pom, you just use them anywhere you like. Usually, if a property is
missing, bad things tend to happen because it is replaced with the
string "null
Jochen Kuhnle wrote:
Hi,
currently, Maven does not require declaration of properties used in
the pom, you just use them anywhere you like. Usually, if a property
is missing, bad things tend to happen because it is replaced with the
string "null". On a good day, resources from "translations-
Thanks for putting the proposals in the wiki. Now with a simple page
watch anyone can be notified when new proposals are added.
On 4 Jul 07, at 12:00 AM 4 Jul 07, Jochen Kuhnle wrote:
On 2007-07-03 19:30:33 +0200, "Jochen Wiedmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
currently, Maven does not requi
How about simply using XSD for validation and accepting namespaced properties?
Mark
On 04/07/07, Jochen Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-07-04 09:04:10 +0200, "Jochen Wiedmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 7/4/07, Jochen Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Can properties be used
On 2007-07-04 09:04:10 +0200, "Jochen Wiedmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
On 7/4/07, Jochen Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can properties be used in this way in the pom.xml? Since the pom
language has no control structures like loops etc., it should be hard
to use lists. Could you give an
On 7/4/07, Jochen Kuhnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can properties be used in this way in the pom.xml? Since the pom
language has no control structures like loops etc., it should be hard
to use lists. Could you give an example, maybe we can find a way to
change the proposal to suit both needs?
On 2007-07-03 19:30:33 +0200, "Jochen Wiedmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
currently, Maven does not require declaration of properties used in
the pom, you just use them anywhere you like.
Don't like the proposal. It is suitable for 90% of all cases, but
doesn't match the cases where you don't
currently, Maven does not require declaration of properties used in
the pom, you just use them anywhere you like.
Don't like the proposal. It is suitable for 90% of all cases, but
doesn't match the cases where you don't know the possible property set
in advance. (For example, if you use somethin
eclare their variables.
Regards,
Jochen
From: news on behalf of Jochen Kuhnle
Sent: Tue 7/3/2007 12:05 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Proposal: Required declaration of properties in pom.xml
Hi,
currently, Maven does not require declaration of properties used in the
pom, you just use them any
e
Sent: Tue 7/3/2007 12:05 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Proposal: Required declaration of properties in pom.xml
Hi,
currently, Maven does not require declaration of properties used in the
pom, you just use them anywhere you like. Usually, if a property is
missing, bad things tend to ha
+1
I think this is a good idea. The next release of the enforcer plugin
(http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-enforcer-plugin/) will have some
property verification features, but it would be nice to add the property
verification stuff directly to the pom.
Jochen Kuhnle wrote:
Hi,
current
Hi,
currently, Maven does not require declaration of properties used in the
pom, you just use them anywhere you like. Usually, if a property is
missing, bad things tend to happen because it is replaced with the
string "null". On a good day, resources from "translations-null-null"
aren't inclu
13 matches
Mail list logo
