Brett Porter wrote on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:57 PM:
The log shows that Maven retrieved the TableLayout without any
problems
from ibiblio, but continues with an attempt to download the
same file from the
local repository. I do not think this is intended.
This is an existing bug, not
although it is possible now to build Maven in the 1.0 branch,
I have proplems with this version. As reported before, Maven
still claims beeing offline and reports warnings, but is also
not able to retrieve the SNAPSHOT artifacts (tested with Jelly-SOAP):
Fixed, not committed.
Our
The log shows that Maven retrieved the TableLayout without any problems
from ibiblio, but continues with an attempt to download the same file from
the
local repository. I do not think this is intended.
This is an existing bug, not one introduced on the branch - you'll find it
in JIRA. Patches
Hi Brett,
Brett Porter wrote on Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:44 AM:
I just bootrapped a clean build after committing some fixes
and it looks file. I saw these problems yesterday.
The fix is a quick hack in MavenUtils.java which I will clean up next
time round.
it looks much better today.
Hi,
repeated the task below right now, but it is getting worse with today's version in
CVS, since building the plugins during bootstrap failes in ashkelon. It seems one of
the changes yesterday from Brett or dIon has side-effects.
Regards,
Jörg
Jörg Schaible wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003
This is caused by an empty maven.xml file.
Not sure why, but I'm removing the offending file now.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/12/2003
07:36:26 PM:
Hi,
repeated the task below right
It now breaks on a valid maven.xml in the faq plugin :-(
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/12/2003
07:36:26 PM:
Hi,
repeated the task below right now, but it is getting worse with today's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:04 PM:
This is caused by an empty maven.xml file.
Not sure why, but I'm removing the offending file now.
Did you commit the deletion into the branch? CVS did not report any change.
Regards,
Jörg
I noticed this too - I think its fixed. More to follow.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2003 11:04 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
It now breaks on a valid maven.xml in the faq
Not yet, as it is a bigger problem that I first thought. :-(
I'm hoping to get it resolved soon, but don't hold your breath today.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/12/2003
11:31:30 PM:
[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2003 11:48 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
Not yet, as it is a bigger problem that I first thought. :-(
I'm hoping to get it resolved soon, but don't hold your
s/file/fine/
:)
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter
Sent: Thursday, 11 December 2003 11:44 AM
To: 'Maven Developers List'
Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
I just bootrapped a clean build after committing some fixes
and it looks file. I saw these problems yesterday
Hello,
unfortunately I have still troubles building Maven from MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH:
1) Checkout maven with MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH tag
2) Checkout maven-plugins from HEAD (the decision was made not to branch the plugins -
right?)
3) Bootstrapping in maven
Following observations during the boostrapping:
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/12/2003
11:33:56 PM:
Hello,
unfortunately I
?
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Maven Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
Well, since I did not had any clue, what jars are really needed, I bootstrapped once
being online. While the build
: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars must be downloaded before running bootstrap.
Well, since I did not had any clue, what jars are really needed, I
bootstrapped once being online. While
-
From: Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Maven Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: RE: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All
: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
try this for obtain an online bootstrap :
%ANT_HOME%\bin\ant -Dmaven.bootstrap.online= -f build-bootstrap.xml
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Maven Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003
?
Emmanuel
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Maven Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Bootstrapping 1.0-branch
In the 1.0 branch, the bootstrap is run offline.
All necessary jars must be downloaded before running
Did you exclude checkstyle, as Brett suggested previously?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/12/2003
12:53:01 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, December 08, 2003 2:29 PM:
In the 1.0
21 matches
Mail list logo
