Brett Porter wrote [and Dennis Lundberg said similar things]:
Given this, I don't see any need to change the way we use the closed
state or reintroduce the resolved workflow step.
Hrm, yes, fair enough, you're probably right. It was just a thought...
--
Richard van der Hoff [EMAIL
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
[MSITE-91]
There has not been any official release of the site-plugin yet, that
incorporates this fix.
You can build the plugin yourself from source, by downloading it from
SVN. Then you just run mvn install. You alse
Richard van der Hoff wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
[MSITE-91]
There has not been any official release of the site-plugin yet, that
incorporates this fix.
You can build the plugin yourself from source, by downloading it
from SVN. Then you
On 16/11/2006, at 3:25 AM, Richard van der Hoff wrote:
Just my opinion here, but it seems wrong to 'close' a bug when
there's no release on the horizon, because:
(a) it might be closed to you, but if the fix depends on maven 2.1
it's as good as useless to real-world users. I think that
