Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-02 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2010-11-02 04:00, Dan Tran wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:40 AM, Dan Tran wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 P

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Dan Tran
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:40 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Dan Tran wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Nov 1,

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:40 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Dan Tran wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On 2010-

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Dan Tran
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >>> On 2010-11-01 18:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Doesn't change the f

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Dan Tran wrote: > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> >>> On 2010-11-01 18:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is generally n

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Dan Tran
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> On 2010-11-01 18:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>> Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is generally >>> not going to get used. >> >> It actually is being used. >>

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On 2010-11-01 18:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is generally >> not going to get used. > > It actually is being used. > >> Dennis, are you committed to supporting it? > > My plan i

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2010-11-01 18:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is generally > not going to get used. It actually is being used. > Dennis, are you committed to supporting it? My plan is to close as many issues as I can and release a 1.0, to get rid of o

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 1, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 01/11/2010, at 1:54 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is generally >> not going to get used. > > I don't disagree, but given it was just yesterday, I think Dennis should get > to

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Manfred Moser
> > On 01/11/2010, at 1:54 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is >> generally not going to get used. > > I don't disagree, but given it was just yesterday, I think Dennis should > get to finish what he's doing. >> >> Dennis, are you committed

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Brett Porter
On 01/11/2010, at 1:54 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is generally > not going to get used. I don't disagree, but given it was just yesterday, I think Dennis should get to finish what he's doing. > > Dennis, are you committed to suppor

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
Doesn't change the fact it's a hack, generally not useful and is generally not going to get used. Dennis, are you committed to supporting it? If so, that's fine, but it's a dead end plugin as far as I'm concerned. Who's going to use it when all the repository managers have some form of staging?

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Brett Porter
Dennis committed to it just yesterday, so I think calling it unsupported is premature. On 01/11/2010, at 8:39 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > This was a hack, and has now been replaced with Nexus staging here at Apache > (and most other forges). I believe this plugin can be archived now. > > Thank

Re: Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Brian Fox
+1 --mobile On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > This was a hack, and has now been replaced with Nexus staging here at Apache > (and most other forges). I believe this plugin can be archived now. > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -

Culling the maven-stage-plugin

2010-11-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
This was a hack, and has now been replaced with Nexus staging here at Apache (and most other forges). I believe this plugin can be archived now. Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl