On 19/04/2013, at 12:07 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/4/19 Brett Porter :
>>
>> On 19/04/2013, at 10:56 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>>> 2013/4/19 Brett Porter :
I'd just make it "no longer supported".
>>> done.
A couple of other things:
- page title is still Tomcat instea
Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/4/19 Brett Porter :
[snip]
>> - we're used 'retired' instead of 'archived' in the past. Though I'm not
>> sure if we need to do that for SVN, particularly since it breaks tags. We
>> could just put a big warning in the directory?
> agree.
... or simple move the trunks
2013/4/19 Brett Porter :
>
> On 19/04/2013, at 10:56 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> 2013/4/19 Brett Porter :
>>> I'd just make it "no longer supported".
>> done.
>>>
>>> A couple of other things:
>>> - page title is still Tomcat instead of Maven
>> fixed.
>>> - we're used 'retired' instead of 'archi
On 19/04/2013, at 10:56 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2013/4/19 Brett Porter :
>> I'd just make it "no longer supported".
> done.
>>
>> A couple of other things:
>> - page title is still Tomcat instead of Maven
> fixed.
>> - we're used 'retired' instead of 'archived' in the past. Though I'm not
>>
2013/4/19 Brett Porter :
> I'd just make it "no longer supported".
done.
>
> A couple of other things:
> - page title is still Tomcat instead of Maven
fixed.
> - we're used 'retired' instead of 'archived' in the past. Though I'm not sure
> if we need to do that for SVN, particularly since it break
I'd just make it "no longer supported".
A couple of other things:
- page title is still Tomcat instead of Maven
- we're used 'retired' instead of 'archived' in the past. Though I'm not sure
if we need to do that for SVN, particularly since it breaks tags. We could just
put a big warning in the d
Great!
A point of detail: " is no longer officially supported"
Though quite similar, shouldn't it be more "is officially no longer
supported" instead?
As I'm not an english native speaker, I'll let others choose anyway.
My 2 cents.
Cheers
2013/4/18 Lennart Jörelid
> Uhm ... I presume you mea
Uhm ... I presume you mean
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x-eol.html
instead, Olivier?
2013/4/18 Stephen Connolly
> seriously, the url is tomcat-1.x-eol
>
>
> On 18 April 2013 12:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > draft available here: http://maven.apache.org/tomcat-1.x-eol.html
> >
> > --
> >
gloups
fixed http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x-eol.html
2013/4/18 Stephen Connolly :
> seriously, the url is tomcat-1.x-eol
>
>
> On 18 April 2013 12:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> draft available here: http://maven.apache.org/tomcat-1.x-eol.html
>>
>> --
>> Olivier
>>
>> 2013/4/8 Hervé BOUTEMY :
>
seriously, the url is tomcat-1.x-eol
On 18 April 2013 12:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> draft available here: http://maven.apache.org/tomcat-1.x-eol.html
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2013/4/8 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> > for the moment, I'm on releases around Maven 3.1-alpha-1, but after
> that, if
> > nobody else w
draft available here: http://maven.apache.org/tomcat-1.x-eol.html
--
Olivier
2013/4/8 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> for the moment, I'm on releases around Maven 3.1-alpha-1, but after that, if
> nobody else wants to do it, I can
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le dimanche 7 avril 2013 19:58:28 Olivier Lamy a écri
for the moment, I'm on releases around Maven 3.1-alpha-1, but after that, if
nobody else wants to do it, I can
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 7 avril 2013 19:58:28 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> +1
> Do you want to take care of that and send similar emails ?
>
> 2013/4/7 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> > notice the r
+1
Do you want to take care of that and send similar emails ?
2013/4/7 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> notice the recent EOL press release for Struts 1 [1]
>
> we should probably use it as a basis for doing something similar
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> [1] http://struts.apache.org/struts1eol-press.html
>
> Le m
notice the recent EOL press release for Struts 1 [1]
we should probably use it as a basis for doing something similar
Regards,
Hervé
[1] http://struts.apache.org/struts1eol-press.html
Le mercredi 27 février 2013 10:33:53 Benson Margulies a écrit :
> I think it's long overtime for us to officia
+1
On 2/28/2013 1:15 AM, Stéphane Nicoll wrote:
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Feb 2013, at 19:34, Benson Margulies wrote:
I think it's long overtime for us to officially disclaim support for Maven 1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
> On 27 Feb 2013, at 19:34, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
>> I think it's long overtime for us to officially disclaim support for
>> Maven 1.
I completely agree. In fact .. while I would suggest to do this asap and
then make the same call for Maven 2. I wonder who would actually be
actively stepping
Yep. The code's there if anyone wants to contribute, but unless someone here
speaks up, I don't think anyone intends to do further work on it.
It would be super-helpful to fold all the JIRA projects related to it, too,
since occasionally people get confused between the versions.
- Brett
On 28/
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We've had similar discussion @Commons about a topic like this one. My view
> is that you'll never know who will step up on volunteer, or who is in
> enough pain to stand up and do the work.
>
I think the question is less of a prediction what
2013/2/27 Benson Margulies :
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> We've had similar discussion @Commons about a topic like this one. My view
>> is that you'll never know who will step up on volunteer, or who is in
>> enough pain to stand up and do the work.
>
> As a matter of
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Feb 2013, at 19:34, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I think it's long overtime for us to officially disclaim support for Maven 1.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For add
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> If someone else
>> wants to support it, they are welcome to do so elsewhere.
>>
>
> Or here through active participation. But while we don't have active
> committers supporting it
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If someone else
> wants to support it, they are welcome to do so elsewhere.
>
Or here through active participation. But while we don't have active
committers supporting it, we should say so. Nothing stops us from doing
more than the offi
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> We've had similar discussion @Commons about a topic like this one. My view
> is that you'll never know who will step up on volunteer, or who is in
> enough pain to stand up and do the work.
As a matter of Foundation culture, we, as a project
+1 and take if off the dist site.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Are there any readers on this list who are prepared to respond to any
> issues on Maven 1.x, especially, for example, security issues? Does
> anyone know how to make a release? Unless that set is non-em
We've had similar discussion @Commons about a topic like this one. My view
is that you'll never know who will step up on volunteer, or who is in
enough pain to stand up and do the work.
I think what is helpful is to list for each branch what the expectations
should be, like version 1 is inactive b
Are there any readers on this list who are prepared to respond to any
issues on Maven 1.x, especially, for example, security issues? Does
anyone know how to make a release? Unless that set is non-empty, we
really need to 'retire' it, I claim.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
Yes, this line is not really true:
"Note that *no further development* is planned for the Maven-1.0 branch,
and Maven-1.1 is in maintenance mode, i.e. development is restricted to
support and bug fixes."
/Anders
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I think it's long overti
+1
On Wednesday, 27 February 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I think it's long overtime for us to officially disclaim support for Maven
> 1.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional comma
I think it's long overtime for us to officially disclaim support for Maven 1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
29 matches
Mail list logo
