Hi Dennis,
i would prefer Option 2 cause it's extensible...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 5/2/15 12:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to visualize which version of the Checkstyle plugin
includes which predefined rulesets. There's are 3 alternatives for you
to look at here:
h
I'd prefer option 1
Robert
Op Sun, 03 May 2015 11:09:46 +0200 schreef Hervé BOUTEMY
:
option 3 is confusing
I like option 1, I find it more clear than option 2: I don't think we'll
have
scalability issues, since the evolution we need to document won't change
in
the future
notice that
option 3 is confusing
I like option 1, I find it more clear than option 2: I don't think we'll have
scalability issues, since the evolution we need to document won't change in
the future
notice that using Markdown, or perhaps html, you could use colspans to merge
content that is the same betwe
I suggest alternative 2 as 1 doesn't scale well with new versions and 3 is
more confusing than 2.
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Of the choices, alternative 1 seems the easiest for me.
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2015, 16:10 Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to v
Of the choices, alternative 1 seems the easiest for me.
On Sat, May 2, 2015, 16:10 Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to visualize which version of the Checkstyle plugin
> includes which predefined rulesets. There's are 3 alternatives for you
> to look at here:
>
> https://maven.apache.
Hi,
I'm trying to visualize which version of the Checkstyle plugin
includes which predefined rulesets. There's are 3 alternatives for you
to look at here:
https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-checkstyle-plugin-LATEST/config/index.html
Please let me know which alternative you think is t
