Fwd: Help Required With debugging and running on the latest version Ref: SUREFIRE-1450

FYI. I appreciate any kind of help to start with debugging/running maven surefire. -- Forwarded message -- From: Enrico Olivelli Date: Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 3:04 AM Subject: Re: Help Required With debugging and running on the latest version Ref: SUREFIRE-1450 To: Hammad Host

Help Required

Can someone give me some inputs on version.jason file ? I want to understand the use of this file and want to pass some variables to this file dynamically.

Re: new maven-loc-plugin, committer help required.

>> amendments to maven-jxr. >> This was done using maven2 mojos (not maven 1). >> >> Now how do I go about getting this stuff committed, or is it not wanted >> and >> should it be chucked? >> >> Regards, >> Neil. >> -- >> View this me

Re: new maven-loc-plugin, committer help required.

ven 1). Now how do I go about getting this stuff committed, or is it not wanted and should it be chucked? Regards, Neil. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/new-maven-loc-plugin%2C-committer-help-required.-tf4066829s177.html#a11555980 Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list

Re: new maven-loc-plugin, committer help required.

mendments to maven-jxr. >> This was done using maven2 mojos (not maven 1). >> >> Now how do I go about getting this stuff committed, or is it not >> wanted and >> should it be chucked? >> >> Regards, >> Neil. >> -- >> View this message in

Re: new maven-loc-plugin, committer help required.

t wanted and should it be chucked? Regards, Neil. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/new-maven-loc- plugin%2C-committer-help-required.-tf4066829s177.html#a11555980 Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at

new maven-loc-plugin, committer help required.

to make a few amendments to maven-jxr. This was done using maven2 mojos (not maven 1). Now how do I go about getting this stuff committed, or is it not wanted and should it be chucked? Regards, Neil. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/new-maven-loc-plugin%2C-committer-hel

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

gt;>>>>> >>>>>>>> MAVEN-1125 ant:java fork issues >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MAVEN-1440 Clearing maven.repo.remote results in incorrect >>>>>>>> reporting >>>>>>>> of unsatisfied dependencies >&g

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

t;> snapshot >>>>>>> artifact after attaining a first goal. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not yet analysed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nice to have : >

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nice to have : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those issues are planned because they can have a real added >>>>>>> value with >>>>>>> few work on them &g

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 12/11/06, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If we fix all backward compat problems then there is no reason for anyone to use a new plugin with an old release of maven... I'm completely agreed ;-) The artifact plugin should be released for RC1, as it contains the fix for MPARTIFAC

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

scribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this mes

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

dditional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maven-1.1- development-status---For-a-

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

If we fix all backward compat problems then there is no reason for anyone to use a new plugin with an old release of maven... The artifact plugin should be released for RC1, as it contains the fix for MPARTIFACT-71 (the reject HostKey error), which was the only blocking plugin issue we had in

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

gt;> MAVEN-1808 Put MAVEN_HOME in the system environment >>> >>> variables if the >>> >>> user has admin rights >>> >>> >>> >>> Easy to fix with the nsis plugin ... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

-1790 Fix headers sent to the repository >>> >>> >>> >>> It's a nice to have if wagon supports it. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> MAVEN-1808 Put MAVEN_HOME in the system environment >>> >>> variables if the >>

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

>>> >> released for RC1 even without upgraded model dependency. >>> >> >>> >> -Lukas >>> >> >>> >> >>>

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

I updated the parent POM in Wagon and deployed a snapshot that you can use until we do the final release. Jason. On 9 Dec 06, at 9:55 AM 9 Dec 06, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Jason, To fix MAVEN-1659

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 9 Dec 06, at 10:12 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: ok, thanks. Can you use a SNAPSHOT for now? Jason. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Jason, > > To fix MAVEN-1659

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 9 Dec 06, at 10:12 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: ok, thanks. Can you come into IRC so we can work through some of these issues? jason. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Jason, > > To fix MAVE

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

ok, thanks. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Jason, > > To fix MAVEN-1659 we > need to > have the fix for WAGONHTTP-5 WAGONHT

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 9 Dec 06, at 9:36 AM 9 Dec 06, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Jason, To fix MAVEN-1659 we need to have the fix for WAGONHTTP-5 . Is it possible to release wagon http 1.0-beta-2 ASAP ?* Yah, the 72 hou

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Jason, To fix MAVEN-1659 we need to have the fix for WAGONHTTP-5 . Is it possible to release wagon http 1.0-beta-2 ASAP ?* *Arnaud* * On 12/9/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another thing

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Another thing which can help us, is to help to setup somewhere a CI like continuum to build maven from the bootstrap. We'll gain a lot of time. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Arnaud Héritier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guys, I'm back. Sorry for the delay to reply to this emergency. As you cer

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

The artifact plugin for the PomRewriter uses directly the maven-model [1] :-( *import* org.apache.maven.project.io.dom4j.MavenDom4jReader; *import* org.apache.maven.project.io.dom4j.MavenDom4jWriter; It's bad and very annoying to keep the compatibility with a given version of the core ... Arna

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Ok, i'll try the STAX-RI this week end and give you a feedback. If it seems to work I'll publish a snapshot to allow our users to test it. Arnaud On 12/9/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 09/12/2006, at 12:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > MAVEN-1755 Backward Incompability :

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Arnaud Héritier wrote: Those plugins use maven-model, thus it could be interesting to wait for the release of maven-model 3.0.2 before to release them : artifact, eclipse, ejb, multiproject and xdoc are ready, they should be released for RC1 even without upgraded model dependency. -

Re: Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

On 09/12/2006, at 12:46 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote: MAVEN-1755 Backward Incompability : Usage of xml entities in the POM doesn't work in maven 1.1 beta 1 & 2 I began to fix this one. I modified the maven-model to use a new one which uses dom4j and not xpp3 (and it works). For that

Maven 1.1 development status - For a release, help required ....

Hi guys, I'm back. Sorry for the delay to reply to this emergency. As you certainly know we released the beta 3 at the beginning of august. The next step for us it to release a first release candidate to quickly have a final release. We are focusing on keeping the compatibility wi