looks like we're stuck walking the tree again (versions-maven-plugin also)
On 4 May 2010 19:12, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Brian Fox wrote:
>
> MavenProject.getOriginalModel() for the raw model, i.e. as read from the
>>> mere pom.xml.
>>>
>>
>> The current pom only or with inheritence?
>>
>
> T
Brian Fox wrote:
MavenProject.getOriginalModel() for the raw model, i.e. as read from the
mere pom.xml.
The current pom only or with inheritence?
The current POM only.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ma
> MavenProject.getOriginalModel() for the raw model, i.e. as read from the
> mere pom.xml.
The current pom only or with inheritence? The latter would usually be
more handy. In the enforcer I would need to get the original poms, but
having inheritence baked in would save me from walking the tree an
David Jencks wrote:
1. We were calling
org.apache.maven.artifact Artifact; //from dependencyNode.getRelatedArtifact()
if not null, otherwise dependencyNode.getArtifact()
artifact.getVersionRange().getRecommendedVersion().toString()
[...] artifact.getVersionRange() is now null on, apparently, n
David Jencks wrote:
2. Plugin plugin = (Plugin)
project.getModel().getBuild().getPluginsAsMap().get("org.apache.geronimo.buildsupport:car-maven-plugin");
plugin.getExecutions() has changed. [...] Now it contains elements for every
mojo in the plugin.
MavenProject.getModel() is
I started trying to build geronimo trunk using maven 3 and ran into a couple
inconsistencies so far in our maven plugins. I don't know if we were doing
something unfortunate before I have no problem changing the geronimo code
to something that will work on both mavens
1. We were callin
