Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-03 Thread Franz Allan Valencia See
I think pre-site is the site lifecycle's "initialize" phase ( as is pre-clean for the clean lifecycle ). On 4/3/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As Jerome pointed out earlier today on the enforcer thread, it would be nice to be able to bind some plugins like the enforcer to a phase t

RE: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
- From: Franz Allan Valencia See [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 10:41 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle I think pre-site is the site lifecycle's "initialize" phase ( as is pre-clean for the clea

Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread Max Bowsher
Brian E. Fox wrote: > As Jerome pointed out earlier today on the enforcer thread, it would be > nice to be able to bind some plugins like the enforcer to a phase that > affects both default and site. After all, if you don't want to support > some Maven/Jdk/Os/other version, chances are that applies

Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread John Casey
Max is right, if you add these phases to the site lifecycle (fine by me, I suppose), they'll have to have different names. This is really unfortunate, but that's the only way they can be incorporated into 2.0.x, or 2.1 (without some redesign). -john On 4/4/07, Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

RE: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle Max is right, if you add these phases to the site lifecycle (fine by me, I suppose), they'll have to have different names. This is really unfortunate, but that's the only way they can be incorporated into 2.0.x, or 2.1 (without some redesign). -

Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Redmond
ooking at a 2.1+ thing here. Adding them but changing the name defeats the whole purpose. Thanks for the info. -Original Message- From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:21 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [discuss] add validate/initial

RE: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
e,pre-site. -Original Message- From: Eric Redmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:08 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle How would this phase work, in a practical manner? If someone runs the phase, which life

Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread John Casey
to multpile phases. Then we could bind to validate,pre-site. -Original Message- From: Eric Redmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:08 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle How would this phase work, in a pr

RE: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
tiples and allow a single execution to be bound to multpile phases. > Then we could bind to validate,pre-site. > > -Original Message- > From: Eric Redmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:08 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [disc

Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread Eric Redmond
n to be bound to multpile phases. > Then we could bind to validate,pre-site. > > -Original Message- > From: Eric Redmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:08 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize

Re: [discuss] add validate/initialize to site lifecycle

2007-04-04 Thread John Casey
w a single execution to be bound to multpile phases. > > Then we could bind to validate,pre-site. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Eric Redmond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 11:08 AM > > To: Maven Developers List > >