> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 6:18 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/artifact/src/plugin- > resources/templates manifest.vm > > > Generic code for: > > > > - deployment of artifact to remote repositry > > > > - installaton of artifact to local repository > > > This seems like code that is duplicating the repository and deploy > plugins. Why do we want a third way of doing this???? >
This one is developed in pure Java + supports deployment to various types of repositories. Soon it will support deployment to multiple repositories. And I think it is easier to use it then other ones + the code is more centralized. I hope to test it with junit. This was rather hard in case of "old" plugins. > Can you please change the others to use this code if it works? It is not yet fully finished. Once I will be sure that it works I am planning to change other plugins. For the moment I use war plugin as demonstration how this is supposed to work from the point of other plugins, so if any body has some remarks... let me know. FYI: package org.apache.maven.artifact.deployer.deploy; is meant to be refactored. I think the best will be to make a "sister" component of "fetch" in maven-new. This code is not depending on any maven apis, and can be possibly reused like does "fetch" component. Package org.apache.maven.artifact.deployer; Contains higher level API, which uses maven API and it is supposed to be used in plugins. [OT] I am thinking about deploying java sources and javadocs to repository. Any idea about naming convention of those artifacts? With maven-new it will be easy to control, with maven-old it is not so easy. I am thinking about: /${groupId}/apis/${artitifactId}_api-${version}.jar (for javadocs) /${groupId}/srcs/${artitifactId}_src-${version}.jar (for sources). Any better ideas? Other question is where is the best place for such functionality? I think for javadoc it is javadoc plugin. But for sources? Any hints what else can we deploy? Other idea: We have; jar:jar war:war ear:ear etc.. Wouldn't it be more consistent to have: jar:archive war:archive ear:archive javadoc:archive java:src-archive etc? regards Michal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]