The repo plugin already has this defined for licenses.
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Maczka Michal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2004 10:20:32 PM:
>
>
> > Ok, so we'll just have a standard extension of "license" and we'll use
> > the form:
> >
> > -.license
> >
> > If this is c
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:37 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: RE: standard name for license file
>
>
> On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 08:20, Maczka Michal wrote:
> >
> >
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 08:20, Maczka Michal wrote:
>
> > Ok, so we'll just have a standard extension of "license" and we'll use
> > the form:
> >
> > -.license
> >
> > If this is cool then I will update the repo plugin to produce this
> > format for the upload bundles.
> >
>
>
> Last question
> Ok, so we'll just have a standard extension of "license" and we'll use
> the form:
>
> -.license
>
> If this is cool then I will update the repo plugin to produce this
> format for the upload bundles.
>
Last question: where do you want to keep a file containing licenses? in
/licenses fol
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 03:05, Rafal Krzewski wrote:
> Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> > Isn't it possible that a dual-license project has the dual license
> > defined in a single license file? Does it have to be in 2 files?
>
> I'd go with a single file. It's just a text file so people can put in
> wha
Vincent Massol wrote:
Isn't it possible that a dual-license project has the dual license
defined in a single license file? Does it have to be in 2 files?
I'd go with a single file. It's just a text file so people can put in
what they need. For example an explaination what parts of the software
a
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 15:29, Vincent Massol wrote:
> I'd prefer to keep the standard -. (i.e.
> keep version the last element of the artifact name).
>
> >
> > Where lic id might be standard abbreviations/ids used at
> >
> > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/
> >
>
> Isn't it possible that a
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2004 21:14
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: standard name for license file
>
> On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 00:03, Michal Maczka wrote:
> > Jason van Zyl wrote:
> >
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 00:03, Michal Maczka wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Did we ever decide on a standard name for the license file? I'm already
> >catching a couple variations in the upload bundles so if we haven't
> >decided already can we pick a file name as I would like to conv
Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Did we ever decide on a standard name for the license file? I'm already
catching a couple variations in the upload bundles so if we haven't
decided already can we pick a file name as I would like to convert it
to:
-.license
When uploading into ibiblio.
I like the id
+1
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2004 18:54
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: standard name for license file
>
> Hi,
>
> Did we ever decide on a standard name for the license file? I'm
already
> catching a couple variat
I'm +1 for the naming but how do we handle project that has one
primary license but by the requirement of other code needs to
include other lics?
On 12 May 2004 12:53:33 -0400, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Did we ever decide on a standard name for the license file? I'm already
cat
12 matches
Mail list logo
