ps clear up any confusion.
Thanks,
Dana H. P'Simer
Dana.P'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Maven Users List
Subject: Re: surefire and testng int
--Original Message-
From: P'Simer, Dana (Matrix) [mailto:Dana.P'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:03 AM
To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: surefire and testng integration issues with surefire-2.4.2
I think part of the di
Jason Chaffee wrote:
Thanks Dan, I will take a look at it and make sure we are clear and
there aren't any misunderstandings before I make any more comments. :)
For future reference, this is SUREFIRE-457. Vote for it if you like, but
as far as I know, we can't fix it on the Surefire side (wi
Users List
Subject: Re: surefire and testng integration issues with surefire-2.4.2
Dan Fabulich wrote:
> Jason Chaffee wrote:
>
>> I did not run your project.
>
> Well, try it and get back to me. You can use that as a starting point
for
> reproducing the effect you actua
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Jason Chaffee wrote:
I did not run your project.
Well, try it and get back to me. You can use that as a starting point for
reproducing the effect you actually want.
Oops, you can't, because the mailing list software stripped my attachment.
You can get a copy here:
Jason Chaffee wrote:
I did not run your project.
Well, try it and get back to me. You can use that as a starting point for
reproducing the effect you actually want.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
Jason Chaffee wrote:
Maybe our disconnect is about callbacks after the class vs. the method.
That could be where the misunderstanding is coming from.
Sure, that could be. I claim that logging per-method is *way* too much
logging. Don't you agree?
In JUnit we can log per-class or per-metho
behavior still works as expected.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 10:18 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Maven Users List
Subject: Re: surefire and testng integration issues with surefire-2.4.2
Jason Chaffee wrote
Users List
Subject: RE: Re: surefire and testng integration issues with
surefire-2.4.2
I did try it. I created my own listener and got the exact output I was
looking for. I am not sure where our disconnect is here, but we
certainly are seeing two different things with respect to the code
, March 20, 2008 10:05 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Cc: Maven Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: surefire and testng integration issues with surefire-2.4.2
Jason Chaffee wrote:
> I brought this up in the past the maven guys were adamant that they
were
> not able to get per test informat
rom me, but I think it is worthwhile to
have the maven developers hear critical feedback from time to tome.
-Original Message-
From: P'Simer, Dana (Matrix) [mailto:Dana.P'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 6:39 AM
To: Maven Users List; Maven Developers List
Subject:
I have recently been dealing with a similar issue. I wanted Junit style
reports and did not want to use ant run to run the JunitConverter task,
so I added reportng as a test scoped dependency and configured a
listener.
As an interim solution, you could write a listener that does what you
want.
12 matches
Mail list logo
