This may all be moot if we decide to postpone any changes until m2 as suggested by
Brett, but I'll update the proposal with Dion's comments (and my responses) just in
case people want to go ahead with it:
> > 1) Ensure backward-compatibility. One solution is to create a property setting
> >
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:02:05 -0700, M. Sean Gilligan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Thanks for the positive feedback and brainstorming. I made some specific
> suggestions on JIRA, I'll repeat them here and incorporate/respond-to some
> suggestions made on the list.
>
> 1) E
All,
These are all good ideas, however it is probably not worth the effort at this
point. m2's plugins are self documenting in the fashion you are talking about,
and there is a clear direction to start pushing them in to use in maven 1 in the
near future.
Hope this helps!
Cheers,
Brett
Quoting
I'd really like to contribute to this task, but I'm not aware of the
protocol (for non commiters) to follow since submiting patches to the
plugin post 1.0 is not an options, as I guess, and there's no 1.1 brach,
or is it?
M. Sean Gilligan wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for the positive feedback and
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for the positive feedback and brainstorming. I made some specific suggestions
on JIRA, I'll repeat them here and incorporate/respond-to some suggestions made on the
list.
1) Ensure backward-compatibility. One solution is to create a property setting to
cause properties.
Heritier Arnaud wrote:
The problem is that in some plugins, the documentation of goals is very
more detailled in the doc than in the plugin.jelly.
In the goal's description you can't use HTML tags. For example :
http://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/dist/goals.html
HTML in goal documentation
> the properties.xml could be generated with a more advanced
> parsing and
> maybe assuming all properties begin with the plugin name
> followed by a '.'
The problem will be to standardize the properties documentation and to
parse the file.
# MY DOC
xxx..=
>
> Should synchro
elly, or does it?
Arnaud
-Message d'origine-
De : Miguel Griffa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 23 juin 2004 14:34
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : Re: maven-plugin-plugin generate docs improvement
(MPPLUGIN-17)
Hi,
I totally agree with this. Generating the goals.xml
shuold b
Miguel Griffa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mercredi 23 juin 2004 14:34
> À : Maven Developers List
> Objet : Re: maven-plugin-plugin generate docs improvement
> (MPPLUGIN-17)
>
>
> Hi,
> I totally agree with this. Generating the goals.xml
> shuold be quite
>
Hi,
I totally agree with this. Generating the goals.xml shuold be quite
easy (a simple matter of xsl), the properties.xml may be another story...
Having goals.xml generated would contribute to a more uniform
documentation
M. Sean Gilligan wrote:
Hello Dion, et. al.,
I thought I'd move some
10 matches
Mail list logo