Re: Zip packaging in 2.0.x (MNG-1683)

2008-01-14 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, 2008/1/9, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/1/9, Tom Huybrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Are you proposing to add the zip packaging to the core ? > > Yep > > > Won't this break (or at least change) builds that have defined their > > own zip packaging ? > > Right, I have to check before

Re: Zip packaging in 2.0.x (MNG-1683)

2008-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2008/1/9, Tom Huybrechts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are you proposing to add the zip packaging to the core ? Yep > Won't this break (or at least change) builds that have defined their > own zip packaging ? Right, I have to check before if an extensions declaration wins or not on "native" maven packa

Re: Zip packaging in 2.0.x (MNG-1683)

2008-01-09 Thread Olivier Lamy
2008/1/9, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > How was it resolved in 2.1? If there is a new zip plugin, will that > conflict with the 2.1 solution? (we'll end up supporting it forever). > And why not just a new goal to the assembly plugin? It's marked as solved in trunk but not sure it's really fi

Re: Zip packaging in 2.0.x (MNG-1683)

2008-01-09 Thread Tom Huybrechts
Are you proposing to add the zip packaging to the core ? Won't this break (or at least change) builds that have defined their own zip packaging ? Tom On Jan 9, 2008 10:06 PM, Olivier Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I have just read a thread [1] on the user mailing list. > Is there any obj

RE: Zip packaging in 2.0.x (MNG-1683)

2008-01-09 Thread Brian E. Fox
How was it resolved in 2.1? If there is a new zip plugin, will that conflict with the 2.1 solution? (we'll end up supporting it forever). And why not just a new goal to the assembly plugin? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olivier Lamy Sent: