Could this be slated for beta-2? And if it is decided to be not the
right time, bump it to 3.1?
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
However, it is important to be able to change the settings.xml file in
future, and the best
On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
Could this be slated for beta-2? And if it is decided to be not the
right time, bump it to 3.1?
I think we should focus on fixing issues for 3.0, but that doesn't mean we
can't start thinking and making prototypes for other features.
On
Brett Porter wrote:
However, it is important to be able to change the settings.xml file in future,
and the best way to do that and still support Maven 2 is by having a second
location. Is Maven 3 already forwards compatible with reading the settings
file? If not yet, I wouldn't consider this
+1
- Message d'origine
De : Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org
À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 17 h 14 min 15 s
Objet : MNG-4483
3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
wondering
can MNG-4483 be addressed?
+1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not found
2010/4/22 Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr
+1
- Message d'origine
De : Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org
À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Jeu 22 avril 2010, 17 h 14 min 15 s
Objet :
+1
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:00 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not found
2010/4/22 Julien HENRY
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, nicolas de loof
nicolas.del...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not found
Wouldn't it _create_ .mvn if it's not found? Otherwise what's going
to happen the first time you use m3 on a new machine?
--
Wendy
This sounds easy on the maven side, but what are the ramifications for
all the tools that would have to be updated. Is it worth it?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
3.0-beta-1 being a beta release, it's getting close to GA. I was
wondering can MNG-4483
Brian,
What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an m2 user
directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a vestigial of
progress.
Paul
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
This
46 s
Objet : Re: Re : MNG-4483
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, nicolas de loof
ymailto=mailto:nicolas.del...@gmail.com;
href=mailto:nicolas.del...@gmail.com;nicolas.del...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 for .mvn and backward compatibility with .m2 if not
found
Wouldn't it _create_ .mvn if it's
What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an m2 user
directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a vestigial of
progress.
Because now every tool that cares about this folder needs to implement
that same
Just to play devil's advocate, if you run maven then sync your tool, maven
will use .mvn, the IDE/tool will only check .m2.
[]s Gus
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
Brian,
What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
FAIL! I was a bit too late :)
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the fallback? It would be an
easy upgrade path. My point is, it's odd Maven 3 has an m2 user
directory -- nothing technically incorrect; just a
Brian,
Then the current situation should be viewed as acceptable? The .m2
directory, although an artifact of Maven 2, continues to be the home
directory for Maven 3.
Paul
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
What ramifications could exist if .m2 is the
The neat-nick in me says no, but I'm also not going to rename
repo1.maven.org/maven2 to /maven3 either. I'm just playing devil's
advocate here to point out that there are additional considerations
than simply changing the maven core logic.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Paul Benedict
On 23/04/2010, at 5:08 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
The neat-nick in me says no, but I'm also not going to rename
repo1.maven.org/maven2 to /maven3 either. I'm just playing devil's
advocate here to point out that there are additional considerations
than simply changing the maven core logic.
Same
16 matches
Mail list logo
