Ok, I've merged this over. I haven't deployed the site - I assume Benjamin will
be doing so shortly after adding the 3.0-alpha-4 release notes. The aggregated
release notes for 3.0-alpha-3+ is there too.
Let me know whether there is anything else I can do to help.
Cheers,
Brett
On 16/11/2009,
On 16/11/2009, at 11:38 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> Can't we keep 2.0.10 only in archives ?
> I don't think it is necessary to do some advertisement for it.
> Latest stable is 2.2.1 and latest Alpha/Beta is 3.0-alpha-3
There are apparently some who haven't upgraded to 2.2.x, either due to a buil
Can't we keep 2.0.10 only in archives ?
I don't think it is necessary to do some advertisement for it.
Latest stable is 2.2.1 and latest Alpha/Beta is 3.0-alpha-3
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009
On 13/11/2009, at 11:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
>
>> I've staged a sample site here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~brett/staged-maven-site/
>
> +1, I like the proposed structure.
>
> Just one minor thing: I believe the JAR/PDF of the site should be listed
> separate
The stable versions are 2.0.10 and 2.2.1, 2.1.0 is not considered stable.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Stevo Slavić wrote:
> IMO 2.1.0 should stay as it is, if I'm not mistaken, most recent stable
> release of maven which is compatible with Java 1.4. When maven 2.2.1 is
> configured as defaul
Brett Porter wrote:
I've staged a sample site here:
http://people.apache.org/~brett/staged-maven-site/
+1, I like the proposed structure.
Just one minor thing: I believe the JAR/PDF of the site should be listed
separately as currently and not be part of the table listing the 2.2.1
download
IMO 2.1.0 should stay as it is, if I'm not mistaken, most recent stable
release of maven which is compatible with Java 1.4. When maven 2.2.1 is
configured as default external maven installation m2eclipse 0.9.9 refuses to
build projects (like maven core plugins) which still require Java 1.4. Maybe
2
On 13/11/2009, at 11:28 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>
> On 13/11/2009, at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven site.
>> How do we want to go about that with alpha-3?
>>
>> To attract more testers, I think we sho
On 13/11/2009, at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven site.
> How do we want to go about that with alpha-3?
>
> To attract more testers, I think we should have this alpha listed in the
> download section. E.g. some
Can't hurt. I have no problem promoting alpha-3. It's the best Maven
that's existed. I say go for it.
On 2009-11-13, at 12:59 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven
site. How do we want to go about that with alpha-3?
To attra
Hi,
I noticed that we didn't mention previous alphas of 3.0 on the Maven
site. How do we want to go about that with alpha-3?
To attract more testers, I think we should have this alpha listed in the
download section. E.g. some structure like
* Stable Releases
2.2.1
2.1.0
2.0.10
* Alpha
11 matches
Mail list logo
