Jesus, the things are different. Let it be I will complete it this
weekend!!!
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> this build is failing:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/
> surefire/job/SUREFIRE-1463/136/console
> to be able to run with jdk9/10 we need to c
this build is failing:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/surefire/job/SUREFIRE-1463/136/console
to be able to run with jdk9/10 we need to change enforcer jdk rule which is
currently [1.8, 1.9)
until this change we cannot build with 9/10 without skipping enforcer check
So if we want
If you could see my issues reported to INFRA you would see what is going
on. I am currently running 23 parallel jobs, also supporting JDK10.
If they run standalone there is no issue. Once the machine is overloaded 3
or 4 problems happen nevertheless JDK is set.
So from my side it is working on JDKs
On 9 February 2018 at 21:57, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy ha scritto:
>
> > On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
> >
> > > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsaf
Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy ha scritto:
> On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup
> first
> > > RC is expected really soon :-
On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup first
> > RC is expected really soon :-)
> > I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a common
I assume that library still uses an enum, which means an upgrade will be
required with every new Java release.
I'd prefer to switch to Plexus Java, which won't have such issue.
I can re-implement that now or after a release of surefire.
Robert
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:15:53 +0100, Gary Gregory
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup first
> RC is expected really soon :-)
> I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 bug (see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-14
Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Hi,
> I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup first
> RC is expected really soon :-)
> I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 bug (see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREF
Hi,
I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup first
RC is expected really soon :-)
I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 bug (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365)
So I s
Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> I have got working build script and got some issues on integration tests in
> TestNG & Java 10.
> See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue because it is
> not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in ther
Hi Enrico,
I have got working build script and got some issues on integration tests in
TestNG & Java 10.
See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue because it is
not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe the build
would pass.
[windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERR
It's ok, not annoying.
The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and therefore I am
working on more difficult issue - the build process.
So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found the
problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script is in [2]. I
should ge
Sorry, I don't want to annoy.
I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users.
I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue
Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to 2.2 ?
2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9
-- Enrico
2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+0
2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli :
>
>
> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana ha
> scritto:
>
>> I was busy at work but now I am free.
>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
>> I should fix branches which are already in
Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
> I was busy at work but now I am free.
> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
> I should fix branches which are already in progress: UnicodeTestNamesIT and
> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455).
Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana ha scritto:
> I was busy at work but now I am free.
> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
I will take a look
Enrico
> I should fix branches which are already in progress: UnicodeTestNamesIT
I was busy at work but now I am free.
I need to have a help with investigating a bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
I should fix branches which are already in progress: UnicodeTestNamesIT and
JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455).
Then all ITs setup with JDK 9.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17
(resending)
Hi Tibor,
Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ?
If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
Cheers
Enrico
Hi Tibor,
Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ?
If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
Cheers
Enrico
20 matches
Mail list logo
