Re: Updating the release plan for Assembly Plugin

2010-10-05 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2010-10-04 18:44, John Casey wrote: Sorry I missed this thread before... On 9/15/10 1:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi I saw that John added http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-502 with a wish for Java 1.5. This is fine, but I think we need to discuss the contents of the coming

Re: Updating the release plan for Assembly Plugin

2010-10-04 Thread John Casey
Sorry I missed this thread before... On 9/15/10 1:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi I saw that John added http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-502 with a wish for Java 1.5. This is fine, but I think we need to discuss the contents of the coming versions. Over the last year or so I've

Re: Updating the release plan for Assembly Plugin

2010-09-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1. Sounds reasonnable for me too to remove those beta/alpha. 2010/9/15 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org: Hi I saw that John added http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-502 with a wish for Java 1.5. This is fine, but I think we need to discuss the contents of the coming versions.

Updating the release plan for Assembly Plugin

2010-09-15 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi I saw that John added http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-502 with a wish for Java 1.5. This is fine, but I think we need to discuss the contents of the coming versions. Over the last year or so I've tried to get rid of as many alpha and beta plugins as possible. We are now down to only

Re: Updating the release plan for Assembly Plugin

2010-09-15 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 alpha and beta tags are better handled as 0.x.y version numbers in any case. once you hit 1.0.0 there should be no need for an alpha or beta tag unless you have the commitment to run the real release within a month or two -Stephen On 15 September 2010 18:28, Dennis Lundberg