Early Access builds for JDK 9 b35 and JDK 8u40 b10 are available on java.net

2014-10-21 Thread Rory O'Donnell
Hi Robert & Kristian, Early Access build for JDK 9 b35 <https://jdk9.java.net/download/> is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here <http://www.java.net/download/jdk9/changes/jdk9-b35.html> Early Access build for JDK 8u40 b10 <http://jdk8.java.net

Re: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09, JDK 8u20 b10 and JDK 7U60 b15 are available on java.net

2014-04-28 Thread Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin ireland
ri, 25 Apr 2014 11:43:20 +0200 schreef Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland : Hi Robert,Kristian, Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09 <https://jdk9.java.net/download/>, JDK 8u20 b10 <https://jdk8.java.net/download.html> and JDK 7U60 b15 <https://jdk7.java.net/download.html&g

Re: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09, JDK 8u20 b10 and JDK 7U60 b15 are available on java.net

2014-04-27 Thread Laird Nelson
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Regarding the JDK-8032205 issue, maybe you should have a look at > MJAVADOC-393[1] > FYI I updated MJAVADOC-393 to link to the relevant JDK bug report. Best, Laird -- http://about.me/lairdnelson

Re: Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09, JDK 8u20 b10 and JDK 7U60 b15 are available on java.net

2014-04-27 Thread Robert Scholte
y Access builds for JDK 9 b09 <https://jdk9.java.net/download/>, JDK 8u20 b10 <https://jdk8.java.net/download.html> and JDK 7U60 b15 <https://jdk7.java.net/download.html> are available on java.net. As we enter the later phases of development for JDK 7u60 & JDK 8u20 , please log

Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09, JDK 8u20 b10 and JDK 7U60 b15 are available on java.net

2014-04-25 Thread Rory O'Donnell Oracle, Dublin Ireland
Hi Robert,Kristian, Early Access builds for JDK 9 b09 <https://jdk9.java.net/download/>, JDK 8u20 b10 <https://jdk8.java.net/download.html> and JDK 7U60 b15 <https://jdk7.java.net/download.html> are available on java.net. As we enter the later phases of development for J

[jira] Closed: (MAVENUPLOAD-78) jdom-b10.jar is out

2004-03-16 Thread jira
the issue: - Key: MAVENUPLOAD-78 Summary: jdom-b10.jar is out Type: New Feature Status: Closed Priority: Trivial Resolution: FIXED Original Estimate: Unknown Time Spent: Unknown Remaining: Unknown

[jira] Created: (MAVENUPLOAD-78) jdom-b10.jar is out

2004-02-20 Thread jira
: - Key: MAVENUPLOAD-78 Summary: jdom-b10.jar is out Type: New Feature Status: Open Priority: Trivial Original Estimate: Unknown Time Spent: Unknown Remaining: Unknown Project: maven-upload-requests Assignee: Jason van Zyl Reporter: Maik Schreiber

[jira] Closed: (MAVEN-401) Release maven-b10

2003-07-24 Thread jira
is an overview of the issue: - Key: MAVEN-401 Summary: Release maven-b10 Type: Task Status: Closed Priority: Major Resolution: FIXED Time Spent: Unknown Remaining: 0 minutes Project: maven

Maven B10 build from CVS HEAD 2003-07-18 broken?!

2003-07-18 Thread Siegfried Göschl
Hi folks, I just downloaded CVSHEAD to test my plugins and the build fails on my Windows box. Thanks in advance Siegfried Goeschl + | Building Maven Changelog Plug-in | Memory: 45M/65M + clean:clean: clean: plu

Re: Duplicate ID in extended POM WAS: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-17 Thread dion
-Original Message- > From: Brett Porter > Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 12:16 PM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: b10 werkz changes break reactor > > > It appears to be a problem with executing more than one goal at a time: > > maven clean cdit:

Duplicate ID in extended POM WAS: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-17 Thread Brett Porter
be better. - Brett -Original Message- From: Brett Porter Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 12:16 PM To: 'Maven Developers List' Subject: RE: b10 werkz changes break reactor It appears to be a problem with executing more than one goal at a time: maven clean cdit:build fail

RE: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-16 Thread Brett Porter
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 10:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: b10 werkz changes break reactor > It appears to be a problem with executing more than one goal at a time: > > maven clean cdit:build fails > maven clean; maven cdit:build works FWIW I've been gettin

RE: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-16 Thread James CE Johnson
Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:12 AM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor > > > On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 20:35, Brett Porter wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems some of the changes made to werkz late in b10 have broken the >> reac

Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-15 Thread bob mcwhirter
ion attribute so you -could- share the global session. Jason's also added, somewhere along the way, dunno if used in b10, some goal/callback listener thingies. -bob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-15 Thread Ben Walding
definitely more to it - but I'm leaving it at that until I can try it out at home. Cheers, Brett -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:12 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor On Tue, 2003

RE: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-15 Thread Brett Porter
can try it out at home. Cheers, Brett -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:12 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 20:35, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > It seems

RE: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-15 Thread Brett Porter
t down with the werkz source in hand. Cheers, Brett -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 July 2003 11:12 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 20:35, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > &

Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 20:35, Brett Porter wrote: > Hi, > > It seems some of the changes made to werkz late in b10 have broken the > reactor in some cases. > I was using a build from CVS of about 1 or 2 weeeks ago that was fine, but > rolling out b10 has caused a lot of "u

Re: b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-15 Thread bob mcwhirter
> Debugging it I have seen WerkzProject return "null" to the eachGoal var in > the plugin manager, but I can't debug werkz as the source at > cvs.werkz.sf.net is out of date. I'm guessing the werkz that got dropped > with b10 is a build from somewhere else? cv

b10 werkz changes break reactor

2003-07-15 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, It seems some of the changes made to werkz late in b10 have broken the reactor in some cases. I was using a build from CVS of about 1 or 2 weeeks ago that was fine, but rolling out b10 has caused a lot of "unknown goal" exceptions when running under reactor. Changing into the appro

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-401) Release maven-b10

2003-07-14 Thread jira
ey: MAVEN-401 Summary: Release maven-b10 Type: Task Status: Unassigned Priority: Major Time Spent: Unknown Remaining: 0 minutes Project: maven Components: release Versions: 1.0-beta-10 Assignee: Reporter: Ben Walding Created:

[jira] Commented: (MAVEN-401) Release maven-b10

2003-07-14 Thread jira
. - View the issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-401 Here is an overview of the issue: - Key: MAVEN-401 Summary: Release maven-b10

Re: b10

2003-07-14 Thread Siegfried Göschl
he.org, where you can > find all you need. > > - Original Message - > From: "Siegfried Goeschl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:36 PM > Subject: Re: b10 > > > &

Re: b10

2003-07-14 Thread nicolas frank
MAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:36 PM Subject: Re: b10 > Sorry for seeming completely dumb but I was not following the MAVEN Mailing > Lists for a while but > > +) http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-turbine-maven/release/ only > shows Beta 8 > > +) Cu

Re: b10

2003-07-14 Thread James Macgill
At 05:36 PM 7/14/2003 +0200, you wrote: Sorry for seeming completely dumb but I was not following the MAVEN Mailing Lists for a while but +) http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-turbine-maven/release/ only shows Beta 8 Maven is now a top-level project on apache. Update your links to start with

Re: b10

2003-07-14 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
-turbine-maven/ is broken Cheers Siegfried Goeschl - Original Message - From: "Incze Lajos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 5:04 PM Subject: Re: b10 > On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:21:47PM +0

Re: b10

2003-07-14 Thread Incze Lajos
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Siegfried Göschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > did I miss Maven B9 or was this release dropped ?! > > Siegfried Goeschl > CTO You missed it. It's been out for monthes. incze - To unsubscribe,

Re: b10

2003-07-14 Thread Siegfried Göschl
Hi folks, did I miss Maven B9 or was this release dropped ?! Siegfried Goeschl CTO = IT20one GmbH mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: +43-1-9900046 fax: +43-1-52 37 888 www.it20one.at On 14 Jul 2003 at 10:02, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > If there are no objections

b10

2003-07-14 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, If there are no objections within the next hour I will tag and release. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul

RE: b10 test installers

2003-07-13 Thread Todd Feather
e from the comment in linkcheck.xml that these problems might be known, but in case they aren't here's a brief error trace. --Todd -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 10:57 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: b10 tes

Re: b10 test installers

2003-07-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2003-07-13 at 14:35, Colin Sampaleanu wrote: > I tried the .tgz version on a simple build. Seems to work ok, except for > oddity on the first attempt to download all the dependencies for the > plugins. Got an issue with Velociry as follows: Thanks for checking it out, much appreciated.

Re: b10 test installers

2003-07-13 Thread Colin Sampaleanu
I tried the .tgz version on a simple build. Seems to work ok, except for oddity on the first attempt to download all the dependencies for the plugins. Got an issue with Velociry as follows: Attempting to download velocity-1.3.jar. . . java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: velocity

b10 test installers

2003-07-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
Howdy, I put a couple archives for the beta-10 here: http://www.apache.org/~jvanzyl/ If a couple people can try these that would be appreciated, once it's agreed they are fine I'll tag and release. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for h

b10

2003-07-13 Thread Jason van Zyl
Howdy, I'm starting to cut b10 so stay clear for a bit. I'm holding off on the 1.1.0 upgrade to AspectJ because I can't get any of the 7 projects that I'm using it with to behave properly. So the AspectJ changes will go into the RC1 but I'll push out the b10 for now.

b10

2003-07-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
Howdy, I'm going to caffeinate myself and then do the aspectj issue for 401 then shall we cut b10? -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justifi

Re: Reactor uses a huge amount of memory - not included in b10?

2003-06-30 Thread Martin Skopp
On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 15:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Message: > >The following issue has been closed. > >Resolver: Jason van Zyl >Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 8:38 AM > > I have fixed this issue but this might not make it into the b10 release. But it will

Unlinked from b10 release: MAVEN-454.

2003-06-29 Thread dion
See previous justification... -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ Work: http://www.multitask.com.au

Removing Maven-465 from b10 release list

2003-06-29 Thread dion
I don't feel that this issue is important enough to hold up the b10 release, and hence have unlinked it from MAVEN-401. If you feel strongly that it MUST be in b10, please relink the issue and vote for it. Regards, -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehau