Re: commit logs (svn commit: r365696)

2006-01-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
Brett Porter wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: That's not a problem, and we can try to get everything useful in a single line for things like Mylar. I didn't know it needed a single line? That might make it harder to read, but we can look into it. It will take more, it's just the one line summary

Re: commit logs (svn commit: r365696)

2006-01-04 Thread Brett Porter
Jason van Zyl wrote: > That's not a problem, and we can try to get everything useful in a > single line for things like Mylar. I didn't know it needed a single line? That might make it harder to read, but we can look into it. > If you actually look at the way Mylar works it pulls everything in fr

Re: commit logs (svn commit: r365696)

2006-01-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
Brett Porter wrote: I still have a problem with this template. Sorry to keep bringing this up, but I'd really like consistency in this area. Eugene made a good point about why the summary should go first, and why we should be consistent: http://www.jroller.com/page/eu?entry=cvs_comment_templates

Re: commit logs (svn commit: r365696)

2006-01-03 Thread Brett Porter
I still have a problem with this template. Sorry to keep bringing this up, but I'd really like consistency in this area. Eugene made a good point about why the summary should go first, and why we should be consistent: http://www.jroller.com/page/eu?entry=cvs_comment_templates_please_don Personall