Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-195

2015-08-20 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 8/20/15 4:06 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Right now attached artifacts are added to a list. Which will result in failures during deploy phase in particular related to repository managers... Apart from that i think that adding the same artifact duplicates (coordinates) looks wrong... >

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-195

2015-08-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
Right now attached artifacts are added to a list. If we only want to allow one attached artifact for a coordinate then we can change that to a map and let the lifecycle update/replace the attachments. This way there cannot be duplicates which is likely what we want versus what’s there now. This

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-195

2015-08-20 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, someone ? On 8/9/15 3:21 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, After diving into the above issue i stumbled over several things... If you take a look here and the log output excerpt: INFO] Minimized 2341 -> 1293 [INFO] Minimized 3282 -> 2234 [INFO] Replacing original artifact with shaded ar

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-195

2015-08-09 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, After diving into the above issue i stumbled over several things... If you take a look here and the log output excerpt: INFO] Minimized 2341 -> 1293 [INFO] Minimized 3282 -> 2234 [INFO] Replacing original artifact with shaded artifact. [INFO] Replacing /Users/kama/ws-git/apache/mshade/msha