Re: svn commit: r1086338 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/pom.xml

2011-03-30 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
DOXIASITETOOLS-57 done, since the concern was only the delay it would add before releasing :) Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 30 mars 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > On 2011-03-30 03:46, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > questions: > > - do we keep Doxia and Doxia Site Tools versions in sync? > > We have

Re: svn commit: r1086338 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/pom.xml

2011-03-30 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2011-03-30 03:46, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > questions: > - do we keep Doxia and Doxia Site Tools versions in sync? We have done so in the past, but Doxia was separated into two projects to be able to release and version them separately. > - any objection to update to Java 5, see DOXIASITETOOLS-57

Re: svn commit: r1086338 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/pom.xml

2011-03-29 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
questions: - do we keep Doxia and Doxia Site Tools versions in sync? - any objection to update to Java 5, see DOXIASITETOOLS-57? Regards, Hervé Le lundi 28 mars 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > On 2011-03-28 21:27, Lukas Theussl wrote: > > hmm, is there a special reason for this? I was under th

Re: svn commit: r1086338 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/pom.xml

2011-03-28 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2011-03-28 21:27, Lukas Theussl wrote: > > hmm, is there a special reason for this? I was under the impression that > we were working on a point release before attacking a major new version. > I'm not objecting, just wondering, if this is only for > DOXIASITETOOLS-50? (note that we will also ha

Re: svn commit: r1086338 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-site-plugin/pom.xml

2011-03-28 Thread Lukas Theussl
hmm, is there a special reason for this? I was under the impression that we were working on a point release before attacking a major new version. I'm not objecting, just wondering, if this is only for DOXIASITETOOLS-50? (note that we will also have to publish a new xsd just for that). -Luka