Why doesn't continuum-model produce the unenhanced JAR, and attach an
enhanced JAR as a second artifact with a classifier?
- Brett
On 08/11/2006, at 9:11 AM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
it's gonna be tricky because continuum-jpox would include the classes
of continuum-model, so it has to exclude t
it's gonna be tricky because continuum-jpox would include the classes
of continuum-model, so it has to exclude that dependency.
On 11/7/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm agree, but I'm not sure it will be used elsewhere that rpc-client
Carlos Sanchez a écrit :
> ok, then we'll
It is...
Mvgr,
Martin
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
I'm agree, but I'm not sure it will be used elsewhere that rpc-client
Carlos Sanchez a écrit :
ok, then we'll probably need continuum-model and continuum-model-jpox,
agree ?
On 11/7/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos,
I'm n
I'm agree, but I'm not sure it will be used elsewhere that rpc-client
Carlos Sanchez a écrit :
ok, then we'll probably need continuum-model and continuum-model-jpox,
agree ?
On 11/7/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos,
I'm not sure it's correct. If you use continuum-model,
ok, then we'll probably need continuum-model and continuum-model-jpox, agree ?
On 11/7/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carlos,
I'm not sure it's correct. If you use continuum-model, you use java classes
enhanced by jpox
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Author: carlos
>
Carlos,
I'm not sure it's correct. If you use continuum-model, you use java classes
enhanced by jpox
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: carlos
Date: Mon Nov 6 18:12:00 2006
New Revision: 471967
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=471967
Log:
Don't rebuild model and depe
