Brett Porter a écrit :
Ah, I see... sorry I misunderstood.
So - it works correctly right now? In a single pom, it signs it normally
and skips the additional signing of the non-existent attached artifact?
Yes.
If so, sorry for the noise.
np.
Emmanuel
- Brett
On 18/12/2006, at 7:29
Ah, I see... sorry I misunderstood.
So - it works correctly right now? In a single pom, it signs it
normally and skips the additional signing of the non-existent
attached artifact?
If so, sorry for the noise.
- Brett
On 18/12/2006, at 7:29 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
My fix remove only a
My fix remove only a NPE when packaging is pom. Without that, the plugin tried
to sync artifact, but it doesn't exist when packaging is pom.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
I heard the same objection from Wendy. Can we roll this change back?
/me needs to track his objections more carefully, n
I heard the same objection from Wendy. Can we roll this change back?
/me needs to track his objections more carefully, noting this has
been released since.
- Brett
On 09/12/2006, at 11:25 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Why not? I think signing the metadata is just as important.
- Brett
On 09/12
Sorry, responded having read the commits list, not the dev list :)
I agreed with your mail - when I said metadata I meant POMs.
Definitely don't need to sign maven-metadata.xml.
- Brett
On 09/12/2006, at 12:19 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 12/8/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why
On 12/8/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not? I think signing the metadata is just as important.
The maven-metadata.xml files? 1. It's not required by the readme file
and 2. They change on every deployment, so you'd be overwriting the
signature, which could well belong to someo
Why not? I think signing the metadata is just as important.
- Brett
On 09/12/2006, at 2:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Fri Dec 8 07:53:20 2006
New Revision: 484646
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=484646
Log:
Don't generate signature on artifact when the
On 12/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Fri Dec 8 07:53:20 2006
New Revision: 484646
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=484646
Log:
Don't generate signature on artifact when the project is a pom
I think poms also need to be signed, see:
http
