Re: svn commit: r511667 - /maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml

2007-02-26 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
You have a few options here. 1) Don't expose jpox enhanced objects in the rpc interface. 2) Have a second set of identical objects, on a different package, that are exposed via RPC. This would require a set of Copy methods to copy the JPOX enhanced object values into this second set of objects. 3)

Re: svn commit: r511667 - /maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml

2007-02-26 Thread Andrew Williams
Reverted. Can someone look at fixing this the correct way then? I would like to use this code. Andy On 26 Feb 2007, at 12:53, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: This patch isn't correct because the rpc client doesn't need enhanced classes. We need to generate model classes for the rpc client without

Re: svn commit: r511667 - /maven/continuum/trunk/continuum-rpc-client/pom.xml

2007-02-26 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
This patch isn't correct because the rpc client doesn't need enhanced classes. We need to generate model classes for the rpc client without enhancement. Please, revert your patch. Emmanuel Andrew Williams a écrit : The SampleClient fails to run without it. Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundE