Re: svn commit: r551613 [2/2] - in /maven/components/branches/MNG-612: maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/resolver/ maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/ar

2007-06-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 29 Jun 07, at 1:57 AM 29 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote: On 28/06/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 28/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One nitpick is that I think we should stick to property names that > follow Java variable name conventions like mavenConflictResolv

Re: svn commit: r551613 [2/2] - in /maven/components/branches/MNG-612: maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/resolver/ maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/ar

2007-06-29 Thread Mark Hobson
On 28/06/07, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 28/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One nitpick is that I think we should stick to property names that > follow Java variable name conventions like mavenConflictResolvers, > and this also prevents any screw ups with any ELs o

Re: svn commit: r551613 [2/2] - in /maven/components/branches/MNG-612: maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/resolver/ maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/ar

2007-06-28 Thread Mark Hobson
On 28/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One nitpick is that I think we should stick to property names that follow Java variable name conventions like mavenConflictResolvers, and this also prevents any screw ups with any ELs or expression resolvers that might potentially get confused

Re: svn commit: r551613 [2/2] - in /maven/components/branches/MNG-612: maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/resolver/ maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/ar

2007-06-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
One nitpick is that I think we should stick to property names that follow Java variable name conventions like mavenConflictResolvers, and this also prevents any screw ups with any ELs or expression resolvers that might potentially get confused by dots in the expression. On 28 Jun 07, at 9:2