Re: Perforce SCM code?

2007-01-31 Thread Franz Allan Valencia See
Good day, I haven't looked deeply into it, but I think what you're looking for is in the SCM Project ( see [1] ). Specifically, maven-scm-provider-perforce ( see [2] ). Cheers, Franz [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/scm/ [2]

[maven2/Continuum/Clearcase/Linux] SCM configuration

2007-01-31 Thread Guillaume Helle
Hello, we are working under Linux with Maven2, COntinuum and Clearcase.. We have a server with Continuum, Clearcase views server and the maven repository. We are using dynamics vies with Clearcase, not Snapshot views. At this time, the SCM configuration doesn't work : scm

RE: MASSEMBLY-121: fix does not work for me.

2007-01-31 Thread Brian E. Fox
done -Original Message- From: berndq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:35 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: MASSEMBLY-121: fix does not work for me. John Casey wrote: As for MASSEMBLY-121, could you reopen it and add a test case that is failing?

Re: [Archiva] Comment on Local Repository Format Reading for DefaultMetadataDiscoverer

2007-01-31 Thread Ole Ersoy
Yes to the index of local repository part. [CONTEXT] My immidiate plan is to mirror the Ibiblio repository so that it's local. Then set the mirrors base directory on the plugin. Then the plugin will produce a repository-metadata.xml (Version 2) per a JIRA entry I submitted. This will be placed

Re: [Archiva] Comment on Local Repository Format Reading for DefaultMetadataDiscoverer

2007-01-31 Thread Ole Ersoy
Sorry - Substitute maven-metadata.xml where I have repository-metadata.xml. Cheers, - Ole --- Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes to the index of local repository part. [CONTEXT] My immidiate plan is to mirror the Ibiblio repository so that it's local. Then set the mirrors base

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standard Reporting

2007-01-31 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Hi guys, it seems that this proposal arrives right on time! :-) I've just been hired by a company that has developed, for its own needs, an application that can store code metrics, consolidate them and show them in various ways. I haven't had the time to look more into it yet, but it looks very

Re: Request Maven 2.1 New Phase - reporting-aggregate

2007-01-31 Thread dvicente
it's my problem with the dashboard-maven-plugin. i must include the dashboard-maven-plugin in reporting section but i must do mvn site to let each report generates their report and after do a mvn dashboard-report:dashboard to aggregate all reports. with that, I lose the site's integration of my

Commons-vfs for Archiva?

2007-01-31 Thread Ole Ersoy
I noticed that there seems to be a lot of overlap between Archiva's approach to file discovery and VFS's. Should Archiva use VFS? Overview: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/VFS Using the API: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/vfs/api.html Here's an example of how to get

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standard Reporting

2007-01-31 Thread dvicente
why don't you join the common effort with dashboard project? see : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-189 (Coordinate the efforts of several users to write a Dashboard Plugin for Maven 2) or http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+Dashboard I think that the same idea ? David

Re: Commons-vfs for Archiva?

2007-01-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
that topic was already brought before and didn't succeed On 1/31/07, Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that there seems to be a lot of overlap between Archiva's approach to file discovery and VFS's. Should Archiva use VFS? Overview: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/VFS Using

Re: Commons-vfs for Archiva?

2007-01-31 Thread Ole Ersoy
Ah - OK - Cool - Just thought I'd check. Cheers, - Ole --- Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that topic was already brought before and didn't succeed On 1/31/07, Ole Ersoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that there seems to be a lot of overlap between Archiva's approach to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standard Reporting

2007-01-31 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
The dashboard plugin is definitely within the scope of this proposal, but is still just 1 consumer of the datapoint data. The dashboard plugin would be definitely be affected dramatically by this concept, it would no longer need to know what the other reports are, how they are formatted, etc.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standard Reporting

2007-01-31 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Joakim is definitely right: the dashboard plugin would only be one consumer. What's more, Maven can generate only static pages while the application I'm talking about is a dynamical web application, with far more possibilities than just generated web pages. As for creating a new maven top level

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standard Reporting

2007-01-31 Thread Garvin LeClaire
Why don't we put the code in the Plugin sandbox at Codehaus? This will give us and other to test drive it and move on from there. I think i need to use the dashboard plugin a little more before we do merging. I could get some of my current users to give feedback. -- Regards, Garvin LeClaire

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standard Reporting

2007-01-31 Thread Garvin LeClaire
Let me fix my over zealeous typing ;-o) Why don't we put the code in the Plugin sandbox at Codehaus? This will give us and others time to test drive it and move on from there. I think I need to use the dashboard plugin a little more before we do merging. I could get some of my current users to

Re: Request Maven 2.1 New Phase - reporting-aggregate

2007-01-31 Thread Mykel Alvis
I'm interested in this, as well. I'm being asked to provide aggregation across several reports (although nobody seems to be able to tell me exactly what I'm aggregating just yet.. :) ) On 1/31/07, dvicente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's my problem with the dashboard-maven-plugin. i must

Re: Commons-vfs for Archiva?

2007-01-31 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Carlos! that topic was already brought before and didn't succeed Do you remember what the problem was? Ciao, Mario - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Commons-vfs for Archiva?

2007-01-31 Thread Carlos Sanchez
the wagon implementations were already done so people din't feel the need I imagine. I'm all for reuse though ;) although it we were going to refactor i'd look into JCR api. On 1/31/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Carlos! that topic was already brought before and didn't

Re: Request Maven 2.1 New Phases - pre-test and post-test

2007-01-31 Thread Jesse McConnell
I think this will be addressed with something that john casey will be posting to the dev list soon in regard to inter-phase plugin execution ordering... combating the proliferation of pre- and post- phases is important I think...but these might be a good idea. lets see how john's stuff pans out

Re: Request Maven 2.1 New Phase - reporting-aggregate

2007-01-31 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jan 07, at 2:38 PM 30 Jan 07, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: I'd like to see a discussion start on adding the possibility of a new phase into the default lifecycle. You mean the default build lifecyle or the site lifecycle? Jason. A reporting-aggregate that executes at the end of all

Re: using saxon within a mojo

2007-01-31 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting Gregory Kick [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm writing a plugin that I would like to be able to use the saxon XPath 2.0 implementation. I've got it working perfectly fine in my unit tests, but when I try to run it as a mojo, it reverts back to using the jdk XPathFactory. I would assume that

Re: DSMP 1.0 - A new maven proxy

2007-01-31 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I played around with this a little today, very nice. How does DSMP handle SNAPSHOT updates? Usually, I just forbid them :-) (see the allow and deny rules). At work, I don't want SNAPSHOTs to pollute my environment, so I disabled them. Even if a POM

Re: Extending the notion of parent pom

2007-01-31 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Do you have even more plugin configuration in this third parent POM? If not, why is it critical that the webapp/library projects can declare themselves to be children of this POM (in addition to the type-specific POMs)? If you do have more plugin

Using maven to build RPMs and problems with the RPM database

2007-01-31 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, I'm just throwing out a question because I have experience a problem with concurrency in the RPM database. Over in the CBUILDs stuff where we are using Maven to build RPMs whenever I do two simultaneous builds where the result is installing an RPM I seem to corrupt the database

Re: repository id vs repository url

2007-01-31 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm the one responsible for the misguided repository.urlName concept. Maybe you'd like to have a look at DSMP (http://www.pdark.de/dsmp/) I'm using the repository ID to find out which user/password to use during deploy but other than that, I'm ignoring

Re: [m2] New pre-package phase?

2007-01-31 Thread Aaron Digulla
Quoting Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I don't think either of these are cases for 'package resources', but general lifecycle improvements (Which are in the 2.1 design wiki). I'm still arguing for a generic lifecycle management (where a mojo can add any number of additional phases and maven

Continuum in Enterprise

2007-01-31 Thread Andrew Williams
I have a problem with continuum booted in Maven Enterprise (alsp happens with continuum-plexus-runtime). When I try to add a m2 project by uploading the pom I get: 2007-01-31 19:02:45,283 [SocketListener0-2] INFO DispatcherUtils- Unable to find 'webwork.multipart.saveDir'

Re: Extending the notion of parent pom

2007-01-31 Thread Aaron Digulla
John Casey wrote: That sparked the idea of having mixins. With mixins, I could separate the two trees cleanly. I'm still a little unclear on how mixins would be cleaner than two levels of inheritance. If multiple levels of inheritance confuses the site plugin, then that plugin

Re: Using maven to build RPMs and problems with the RPM database

2007-01-31 Thread John Casey
Concurrency is an issue any way you slice it, and it's not just limited to RPMs. RPMs represent a set of files installed on the system, so you have to somehow verify that you're not installing the same RPM _or_file_list_ on one system at the same time. Granted, this isn't as severe a limitation

Re: Using maven to build RPMs and problems with the RPM database

2007-01-31 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 31 Jan 07, at 11:37 AM 31 Jan 07, John Casey wrote: Concurrency is an issue any way you slice it, and it's not just limited to RPMs. RPMs represent a set of files installed on the system, so you have to somehow verify that you're not installing the same RPM _or_file_list_ on one system

Perforce SCM code?

2007-01-31 Thread Heck, Joe
Hi, I'm trying to track down (and hopefully fix) a bug with using Continuum with Perforce (and Ant builds- although I don't know if that's relevant). I'm not at all familiar with the code base, so I thought I'd ask for a pointer or two.. I've logged the bug that I've found at

Re: [vote] Release Maven Parent POM 5 and Maven Plugins Parent POM 8

2007-01-31 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+0 on this If Jason says go then go. Unfortunately I haven't been able to verify the poms myself. Can't seem to find enough time right now between day job and a crashing computer at home :( Brett Porter wrote: Hi, This is a dependency for upcoming plugin releases. The changes to each are

[result][vote] release maven-changelog-plugin 2.0

2007-01-31 Thread Dennis Lundberg
The vote has passed with the following votes: +1: Dennis Lundberg, Rahul Thakur, Allan Ramirez, Emmanuel Venisse, Jesse McConnell, Andrew Williams, Joakim Erdfelt I will await the pending vote to release the current SNAPSHOT versions of the parent poms, that this plugin depends upon, before

Re: [result][vote] release maven-changelog-plugin 2.0

2007-01-31 Thread Brett Porter
On 01/02/2007, at 7:38 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: I will await the pending vote to release the current SNAPSHOT versions of the parent poms, that this plugin depends upon, before cutting the release. I think that vote has effectively been cancelled. We're now waiting for Jason to make

Re: Continuum in Enterprise

2007-01-31 Thread Brett Porter
It's a bug in Jetty 5. Need to upgrade to Jetty 6 at some point. On 01/02/2007, at 6:09 AM, Andrew Williams wrote: I have a problem with continuum booted in Maven Enterprise (alsp happens with continuum-plexus-runtime). When I try to add a m2 project by uploading the pom I get: 2007-01-31

Re: [vote] Release Maven Parent POM 5 and Maven Plugins Parent POM 8

2007-01-31 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 31 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 31 Jan 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote: +0 on this I have all day tomorrow set aside for release goop. I will start in the wee hours PST and go until the release stuff is in the POM, doco'd and then I'll pump out the other stuff. At that point anyone should be able

Re: Feature request: per-module local version in profile

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Lundquist
Ralph Goers wrote: export MAVEN_OPTS=-Dmaven.repo.local=$PWD/.mvn Mark Lundquist wrote: So my argument is that my expectation that builds would be self-contained was reasonable. And in fact, separate builds on separate machines *are* (by default) self-contained! I am arguing that it

Re: Using maven to build RPMs and problems with the RPM database

2007-01-31 Thread Bob Allison
The RPM plugin I wrote in Codehaus uses a subdirectory of ${basedir}/target as the place where everything to be packaged is assembled. This should mean that the _BUILD_ of an RPM can run in parallel with another _BUILD_. It is always going to be bad form to try to do multiple _INSTALL_

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism

2007-01-31 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (39 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MEV-483 Still invalid deps in 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-483 MEV-479 Invalid POI POM

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads

2007-01-31 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (25 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MAVENUPLOAD-1356Upload Spring Modules Validation 0.7 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-1356 MAVENUPLOAD-1355Upload Core JSF Validator (commons

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Brett Porter
Edwin - can we double check the requirement here. I recently removed this to prevent the problem of it failing if you haven't installed the project first. What step does it fail at? - Brett On 01/02/2007, at 1:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: epunzalan Date: Wed Jan 31 18:46:11

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Brett, Its failing in phase check-dependency-snapshot phase... the phase uses project.getArtifacts() which is not populated when its missing Brett Porter wrote: Edwin - can we double check the requirement here. I recently removed this to prevent the problem of it failing if you haven't

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Brett Porter
I see - I suppose it is only failing when the artifacts are not present in the repository already, as it was working for me... Can the code using getArtifacts() be changed to getDependencies() without changing the meaning? (Sorry, I haven't looked, I just know the dep resolution was

server/branches/1.2 build failing due to surefire not finding junit?!

2007-01-31 Thread Jason Dillon
Anyone know whats going on? The build is failing because the surefire plugin is unable to find junit classes: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/TestCase WTF? This is relatively new behavior... something has changed in the past day or so which is causing this... but I've

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
getArtifacts is transitive and getDependencies isn't. How about a manual artifact resolution using the project builder ? Brett Porter wrote: I see - I suppose it is only failing when the artifacts are not present in the repository already, as it was working for me... Can the code using

Re: server/branches/1.2 build failing due to surefire not finding junit?!

2007-01-31 Thread Jason Dillon
Appears that trunk fails in the exact same way... :-( --jason On Jan 31, 2007, at 8:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: Anyone know whats going on? The build is failing because the surefire plugin is unable to find junit classes: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: junit/framework/TestCase WTF?

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Edwin Punzalan
But you have a point... i don't think we need transitivity here. If a dependency is already released, then we can *assume* that it has no SNAPSHOT dependency as well. I'll look into it. Thanks. Brett Porter wrote: I see - I suppose it is only failing when the artifacts are not present

Re: svn commit: r502089 - /maven/release/trunk/maven-release-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/release/PrepareReleaseMojo.java

2007-01-31 Thread Brett Porter
On 01/02/2007, at 3:57 PM, Edwin Punzalan wrote: getArtifacts is transitive and getDependencies isn't. Right - that's what I was sort of implying - does the affect the code in question? I would have thought that for this phase, it wouldn't - but I could be (probably am?) wrong. How

maven.repo.local needs to be absolute or canonical (was Re: server/branches/1.2 build failing due to surefire not finding junit?!)

2007-01-31 Thread Jason Dillon
Aight, I think I understand why this happens... When I was building locally and on remote systems, I was using - Dmaven.repo.local=repository to use a specific repository directoy. But it looks like something inside of Maven or Surefire is not happy if this value is not absolute or