Agree on this comments.
User Guide could be the second entry.
The structure is fine. (now we have to populate this)
--
Olivier
2007/9/24, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The order is a little odd.
I would personally put the User's Guide as more important than the
Developer's Guides.
The
Hi,
Inline
2007/10/3, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
We are near the end of 1.1, it's time to discuss of 1.2 roadmap :)
For this new version, my vision is:
- Rewrite all the UI with a full GWT site. I want to migrate to GWT
because we need better performance on the UI even if it is
Hi,
I have committed fix for this.
Can you test ?
Stephane, I have permission issues when deploying the snapshot
-rw-r--r-- 1 snicoll apcvs380 Aug 12 03:43 maven-metadata.xml
Can you fix permission or redeploying a snapshot ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2007/10/4, Timothy Reilly [EMAIL
Hi Stephane,
Ok you're right.
Handling zip automatically must be off by default.
I will reopen issue and fixing this.
--
Olivier
2007/10/8, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
On 10/8/07, olivier lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have committed fix for this.
Can you test ?
I've
Ok, I see.
But if I had a zip overlay manually : do I win against the global for this ?
--
Olivier
2007/10/8, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Olivier,
The idea we put forward was the presence of a flag that enable /
disable the zip handling altogether. Having to declare every overlay
/10/8, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/8/07, olivier lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I see.
But if I had a zip overlay manually : do I win against the global for
this ?
had - add ?
Well, no. The flag disables the behavior altogether. If it's
activated, all overlays are taken
Hi,
Is there any objections to have a fisheye support here :
http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/
--
Olivier
Hi,
I have fixed both (thanks for the patch).
A new maven-war-plugin snapshot have been deployed
maven-war-plugin-2.1-alpha-1-20071015.195227-3.jar.
Can you try it ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2007/10/14, Tomasz Pik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 10/14/07, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
Hi,
plexus-utils version 1.4.7 done.
I have updated the maven-war-plugin pom to use released version.
Stephane : maybe you can call the vote on thursday ?
--
Olivier
2007/10/16, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
On 10/15/07, Tomasz Pik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS Now I need to lobby
Hi,
Just tested with the tag and the generated sample reports.
There is an issue in the generated changes-report.html.
In the Release History, the generated link to the version is #a1.0 whereas
the the anchor is a name=1.0.
I have committed the simple fix in rev 586124. (now the anchor is a name=
+1
--
Olivier
2007/10/19, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven war plugin 2.1-alpha-1. This version brings
a complete refactoring of the packaging as well as the overlay
mechanism. One can now specify the order in which overlays are applied
in a first-win
have you tried the current trunk ?
;-)
--
Olivier
2007/10/19, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks like these were still outstanding and sitting in my task list
(the first one was done though).
Other opinions on the last one before I file them all?
- Brett
On 24/09/2007, at 5:59 AM,
+1.
--
Olivier
2007/10/18, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Continuum crew had a bunch of good suggestions to make the generated
NOTICE files more organized and more readable as well as reproduceable.
(sorted instead of random map ordering) I'd like to get this released
so they can use
+1
2007/10/20, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Stéphane
On 10/20/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to once more try to release maven-changes-plugin 2.0-beta-3. On
the second try, Olivier Lamy found an issue with anchors not being
properly encoded
+1
--
Olivier
2007/10/23, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please vote for a release of maven parent and two of the children
Maven parent 7
- upgraded remote resources plugin and apache resources bundle to latest
release
- added javadoc urls
- added developers
+1
--
Olivier
2007/10/24, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I ran into an issue releasing 2.0.8 due to
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-296 and the addition of the
${mavenVersion} in the poms. This release is required for a release of
2.0.8.
Staging repo:
Hi,
I have an issue concerning site deployment with multi modules project.
(don't know if it's a know issue).
My root pom contains :
distributionManagement
site
idsftp-rec-ap2/id
urlsftp://xx.xxx.xxx.xxx/${rootPath}/url
/site
/distributionManagement
With mvn 2.0.7 root
MNG-3254.
I have attached a sample project.
--
Olivier
2007/10/24, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This could be related to one of the fixes, please create a jira and I'll
check it out
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
olivier lamy
Hi,
Have you try with last maven-site-plugin snapshot ?
I think you have to.
--
Olivier
2007/10/25, Banck, Arent-Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I am trying to build continuum-dev, but get errors on some apt files on
the toc macro. When this happens the generated html has is 0 length.
Do I need to
Hi,
I have the same issue with the site plugin when I have added an it.
Have a look at the pom [1] to see how goals are invoked :
goal${project.groupId}:${project.artifactId}:${project.version
}:site/goal
With this notation no harcoding in the it poms.
--
Olivier
[1]
Is this really needed ? (The site plugin has a dependency to p-u 1.4.5.)
2007/11/1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: hboutemy
Date: Thu Nov 1 09:11:16 2007
New Revision: 591067
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591067view=rev
Log:
[MSITE-239] copied XML encoding support
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/8, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1 this time. :-)
Dan
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-source-plugin 2.0.4.
Two bugs were found when testing the first release candidate of 2.0.4.
These have now been
Hi,
I have comitted a fix in rev 595059.
--
Olivier
2007/11/14, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dennis,
I am aware with this. I will implement MCLEAN-8
Cheers,
Vincent
7/11/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Online report :
Hi,
This build looks to require some external setup [1] to build with continuum.
I will try to fix this.
--
Olivier
[1]
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/surefireReport.action?buildId=35468projectId=57#org.apache.maven.shared.invoker.DefaultInvokerTest
7/11/18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Hi,
I have an issue :
[WARNING] repository metadata for: 'artifact
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin' could not be retrieved from
repository: rec-ap2-m2-plugins due to an error: Unsupported Protocol:
'http': Cannot find wagon which supports the requested protocol: http
deploying
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/21, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1 :)
-Deng
Brett Porter wrote:
I'd like to call a vote for Nicolas de Loof as a committer, based
primarily on his work for Archiva, but also from being active in the
general Maven community for quite some time. He has been
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/21, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
In the preparation of the Maven Clean Plugin release, I would like to
release the maven-shared-io:1.1
The last release was done around one year ago.
Staging repo:
http://people.apache.org/~vsiveton/staging-repo/
Vote
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/22, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few
weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with
the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote)
The release is staged at:
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/23, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alex did the work to make TestNG support pretty much fully functional
on Surefire trunk some months back and he and Dan Fabulich are now
discussing this on the surefire-dev list and looking to complete the
work. Alex is already a
Hi,
Sometimes continuum hangs or stop on this machine (I don't know the reason).
I'd like to restart it but I don't have karma on this machine.
Is-it possible to have ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/24, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-6.
We have resolved 36 issues since the last release, 18 months ago.
Release Notes:
-peak
times (week end).
--
Olivier
2007/10/9, olivier lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Is there any objections to have a fisheye support here :
http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/
--
Olivier
+1
--
Olivier
2007/11/24, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-help-plugin 2.0.2.
This release fixes a couple of bugs and improves the documentation.
There are still improvements and feature requests left in JIRA, but I
feel that they can be schedules for a
I have compilation failure with jdk1.4 :
getResources(java.lang.String) in java.lang.ClassLoader; overridden method
is final
This method was final with 1.4.
--
Olivier
2007/12/3, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This vote passes with 7 +1 (4 binding) votes and no other votes.
carlos*,
Hi,
I confirm binaries doesn't work.
MRRESOURCES-29
--
Olivier
2007/12/4, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 03 December 2007, olivier lamy wrote:
I have compilation failure with jdk1.4 :
getResources(java.lang.String) in java.lang.ClassLoader; overridden
method is final
+1
--
Olivier
2007/12/4, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
On 3 Dec 07, at 4:16 PM 3 Dec 07, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
Following Maven release, I'd like to release Maven Ant Tasks 2.0.8.
We solved 17 issues:
+1
--
Olivier
2007/12/5, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Continuum have it's own
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
list?
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Brett
an email directly to the
committer, that caused a build to fail? Such emails have a higher chance
of getting noticed.
[1]
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=38199projectId=382
olivier lamy wrote:
I have compilation failure with jdk1.4 :
getResources
+1
--
Olivier
2007/12/5, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the
maven-remote-resources-plugin. The only change between this and
1.0-beta-1 is to fix the fact that 1.0-beta-1 would not work with JDK
1.4 due to it overriding a method that was final in
Hi,
I'd like to work on release for maven-invoker-plugin (and maven-invoker).
For this there are two things to release maven-invoker and
maven-invoker-plugin.
Does this needs two separate votes ?
But first, is the documentation here [1] up to date ?
Can I do this as I'm not a PMC ?
An other
Hi,
IMHO, don't use maven-embedder.
Because for a plugin with a required maven version = 2.0.6, tests with
embedder will failed.
Look at the jar plugin all tests has been migrated to maven-invoker-plugin
due to this.
--
Olivier
2007/12/12, Johan Kindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I created a few
Hi,
I will fix that and restart a vote.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2007/12/12, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Olivier,
In the respect of Apache rules, you need to lock the source-plugin to
2.0.4 before doing a release. See recent Dan's mail [1].
Cheers,
Vincent
[1]
+1
--
Olivier
2007/12/12, Mauro Talevi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Following fixes, new version 1.0-alpha-15 has been staged for release.
Please for vote for its release and to move this version of the sandbox
(and start dev of 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT).
Staging area:
Hi,
I know there is some discussions about invoker versus verifier etc...
But this means we have to wait the end of the discussions before releasing
something ?
Some of you have voted +1 on the first try.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
12 Dec 2007 18:13:38 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Nobody ?
One PMC is missing.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
12 Dec 2007 18:13:38 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
In the preparation of the Maven Invoker Plugin release, I would like to
release maven-invoker:2.0.7
The last release was done around one year ago.
Staging repo :
The votes has passed with the following result
+1 (binding) John, Lukas, Brian
+1 (non binding) Olivier
+0 Dan
I'll will move the artifacts to the sync repo.
Thanks
--
Olivier
12 Dec 2007 18:13:38 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
In the preparation of the Maven Invoker Plugin
+1 .
--
Olivier
2007/12/15, Mauro Talevi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
all showstoppers have been addressed. Second attempt for Maven Surefire
2.3.1 release.
Issues solved:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541styleName=Htmlversion=13251
Staging repo:
It's a dependency of plexus-archiver 1.0-alpha-9 [1].
I have declared it to add exclusions of plexus-container which is a
dependency of plexus-io.
--
Olivier
[1]
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-archiver/1.0-alpha-9/plexus-archiver-1.0-alpha-9.pom
2007/12/16, Dennis
.
olivier lamy wrote:
It's a dependency of plexus-archiver 1.0-alpha-9 [1].
I have declared it to add exclusions of plexus-container which is a
dependency of plexus-io.
--
Olivier
[1]
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-archiver/1.0-alpha-9/plexus-archiver-1.0-alpha-9
Hi,
Agree on merge but in a new plugin or merging in maven-invoker-plugin ?
Before starting this work, I'd like to release the current
maven-invoker-plugin to not delay some other releases which depends on this.
I will call a vote today.
After we can work on the merge.
Thoughs ? or objections ?
Nobody ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
17 Dec 2007 09:31:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-invoker-plugin 1.1.
This release fixes some bugs and makes some improvements. The last release
was made over 1 year ago.
We solved 11 issues :
] Release Maven Invoker plugin version 1.1
+1
On 19 Dec 07, at 12:41 AM 19 Dec 07, olivier lamy wrote:
Nobody ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
17 Dec 2007 09:31:24 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-invoker-plugin 1.1.
This release fixes some bugs
+1
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2007/12/20, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Maven Surefire version 2.4 is on the runway. Hopefully folks have spent
some time trying out the SNAPSHOT version, because we expect ordinary
users to get auto-upgraded to version 2.4 when we decide to release.
This
jdcasey apcvs40 Jan 17 2007 maven-metadata.xml.sha1
drwxr-xr-x 2 jdcasey apcvs 1024 Jan 17 2007 1.0
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2007/12/20, olivier lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding) Jason, Brian, Lukas
+1 (non binding) Nicolas, Olivier
I'll
Hi,
Agree to start processing this.
If I can help I will.
--
Olivier
2007/12/20, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, what's next?
This seems generally in favour - now might be a good time to get
started on it?
From past experience the steps would be:
- poll the current maven committers
No issue fixed here.
My only concerns was to add a dependency on p-u because p-u is used
directly in some classes of the project.
I know p-u comes here by transitivity from the other dependencies.
It's just to declare something we use directly in the project.
Sure not mandatory, do you want I
Change committed
Thanks.
--
Olivier
2007/12/23, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
These should be in pluginManagement, otherwise you introduce a
circular dependency when building from the top level.
On 22/12/2007, at 7:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Sat Dec 22 00:16:38
If I use maven-archiver in a application without any p-c-a dependency.
This will cause java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/codehaus/plexus/logging/AbstractLogEnabled
IMHO, we must leave this pom as it and add exclusions in the maven
plugins which will use maven-archiver (as in jar plugin).
+1 (non binding)
--
Olivier
2008/1/3, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I knew it was a mistake to call a vote on the day after Christmas. ;-)
More votes, please! Currently it's just me and Marat Radchenko, both +1
non-binding.
-Dan
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Hi,
Maven Surefire version
Hi,
In preparation of Maven Jar Plugin release, I'd like to release Maven
Archiver 2.3.
As this component doesn't have his own jira project, we have added a
changes report which is available here :
http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-sites/maven-archiver/changes-report.html#a2.3
Staging repo
+1 (non binding)
--
Olivier
2008/1/5, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-pmd-plugin 2.3. The issue with missing LICENSE
and NOTICE files, that Vincent found, has been taken care of.
We have resolved 10 issues since the last release, 10 months ago.
Release
Hi,
No more PMC to push a +1 ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/1/3, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
In preparation of Maven Jar Plugin release, I'd like to release Maven
Archiver 2.3.
As this component doesn't have his own jira project, we have added a
changes report which is available here
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding) : Dennis, Stephane, Arnaud
+1 (non binding) : Olivier
I will move the artifacts to the central repo and publish the new site.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
-
To
+1
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/1/5, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyone think a 1.0.1 release with the current fixes might be in order?
- Brett
On 05/01/2008, at 4:42 AM, brewk9 wrote:
I see this is fixed - just wondering how/when it would be available
in a
release?
--
View
+1
--
Olivier
2008/1/8, Raphaël Piéroni [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I would like to prepare the alpha-1 release of the archetypeng stuff.
Preparing that release will need to do these things:
1. move the current archetype code
(svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/archetype/trunk) to a branch
Hi,
I have just read a thread [1] on the user mailing list.
Is there any objections if I reopen the issue [2] and fix it in the
2.0.x branch ?
A new plugin (maven-zip-plugin) will be added too.
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
[1]
.
Tom
On Jan 9, 2008 10:06 PM, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have just read a thread [1] on the user mailing list.
Is there any objections if I reopen the issue [2] and fix it in the
2.0.x branch ?
A new plugin (maven-zip-plugin) will be added too.
Thoughts
Of
Olivier Lamy
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 4:06 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Zip packaging in 2.0.x (MNG-1683)
Hi,
I have just read a thread [1] on the user mailing list.
Is there any objections if I reopen the issue [2] and fix it in the
2.0.x branch ?
A new plugin (maven-zip
Hi,
I'd like to release the Maven Jar Plugin version 2.2.
We solved 26 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12878styleName=HtmlprojectId=11137Create=Create
Staging repo : http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-repo
Staging Site :
, because I have a few things I'd like to fix in the docs before
the release.
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release the Maven Jar Plugin version 2.2.
We solved 26 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12878styleName=HtmlprojectId=11137Create=Create
wrote:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Ok (in fact license header was not here even before release).
Yes it was there before the first release cycle. I caught it in the
commit email:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-jar-plugin/pom.xml?r1=610166r2=610863diff_format=h
I have
Hi,
I'd like to release the Maven Jar Plugin version 2.2.
We solved 26 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12878styleName=HtmlprojectId=11137Create=Create
Staging repo : http://people.apache.org/~olamy/staging-repo
Staging Site :
][Second Try] Release Maven Jar plugin version 2.2
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:01 +0100, Olivier Lamy wrote:
I'd like to release the Maven Jar Plugin version 2.2.
We solved 26 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12878styleName
=HtmlprojectId=11137Create=Create
+1
--
Olivier
2008/1/13, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In preparation for releasing the dependency plugin, I'd like to release
the maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0. This has a few fixes documented under
the latest mdep release.
Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository
Hi,
2008/1/9, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/1/9, Tom Huybrechts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Are you proposing to add the zip packaging to the core ?
Yep
Won't this break (or at least change) builds that have defined their
own zip packaging ?
Right, I have to check before
Hi,
Don't really know (works fine here).
Maybe, if you have never go with ssh to the server (the entry is not
in ~/.ssh/known_hosts) the fingerprint acceptance is asked and due to
an issue similar to MRELEASE-263 the plugin hang.
--
Olivier
2008/1/15, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I still
Hi,
No more PMC to push a vote ?
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/1/14, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release the Maven Jar Plugin version 2.2.
We solved 26 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12878styleName
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following votes :
+1 (binding) : deng, dennis, lukas, vincent
+1 (non binding) : mauro, nicolas, olivier
I will move the plugin to the central repo.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
-
To unsubscribe,
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Jar
Plugin, version 2.2.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jar-plugin/
You can run mvn -up to get the latest version of the plugin, or
specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
plugin
Hi,
In fact this is not the real use case ;-).
look at the verify.bsh, we test the generated download.html from
src/it/MSITE-265/src/site/apt/download.apt.vm.
But I have discovered the verify.sh didn't return false in case of failure.
I will fix that.
--
Olivier
2008/1/17, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/1/17, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
2008/1/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Jan 16 15:40:57 2008
New Revision: 612633
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=612633view=rev
Log:
fix the verify.sh to failed in case bad interpolation of
+1 (dependency:tree is a very nice/helpful feature !)
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/1/22, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's been a long time since the last release and we have lots of
improvements/fixes:
Release Notes - Maven 2.x Dependency Plugin - Version 2.0
** Bug
* [MDEP-59] -
Oups my bad you're right.
I will revert this.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/2/7, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't understand this change. Aren't these two configuration
parameters mutually exclusive?
archive/manifestFile Says to use this manifest file
useDefaultManifestFile Says to use
Hi,
Here it's a global option at the mojo level to disable filtering on
user defined file extensions.
IMHO, it's more easy for a user to not have declare twice a resource
(in the war plugin : webResource or an overlay) directory :
- one with filtering enabled (with some includes/excludes to
16, 2008 10:28 AM, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here it's a global option at the mojo level to disable filtering on
user defined file extensions.
IMHO, it's more easy for a user to not have declare twice a resource
(in the war plugin : webResource or an overlay) directory
+1
--
Olivier
2008/2/18, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Definitely +1
Vincent
2008/2/18, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'd like to propose giving commit access to Benjamin.
During the last few months, he has provided patches in so many areas of
Maven that I can't list them
+1.
--
Olivier
2008/2/19, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
On 18-Feb-08, at 8:58 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
I'd like to do the first release of the Maven Stage Plugin. This
plugin is already being used for Maven releases, and although it has
limited functionality, it seems to be
Hi,
As you know some plugins made some filtering base on the code coming
from the maven-resources-plugin.
This means there are some copy and paste from the resources plugin
source to other plugins.
To prevent this, the code from the resources plugin has been put in a
plexus component (currently
plugin and ease a lot of
stuff
Is there any reason you choose doing this?
Thanks,
Stéphane
On Feb 19, 2008 10:17 AM, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
As you know some plugins made some filtering base on the code coming
from the maven-resources-plugin.
This means
Yep sure.
Currently, the new component use the same strategy as the
maven-resources-plugin.
--
Olivier
2008/2/19, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess we should have a look to the way this is done currently to
avoid breaking the backward compat.
On Feb 19, 2008 11:30 AM, Olivier Lamy
Hi,
Is there a reason to not upgrade jar plugin to 2.2 and surefire plugin
to 2.4.1 ?
--
Olivier
2008/2/19, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
like to release maven parent pom r628845 as version 8.
Source:
Hi,
I have upgraded jar plugin and surefire plugin versions (2.2 and
2.4.2) in rev 629958.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/2/21, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
To get the latest version of
Hi,
I have this failure on my laptop too.
Someone else have it too ?
--
Olivier
8/2/22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Online report :
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=42494projectId=13
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Hi,
Ok I understand the point (I have reverted the commit).
But 2.0.6 has been released ~ 1 year ago.
What could be the time to wait to add a core prerequisite ? (Note :
the jar plugin have this prerequisite and I haven't yet seen user
complaining).
I don't know how many people use mvn before
/browse/MRESOURCES-39
[2] http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/reference/properties.html
2008/2/19, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yep sure.
Currently, the new component use the same strategy as the
maven-resources-plugin.
--
Olivier
2008/2/19, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess we
+1.
--
Olivier
2008/2/24, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
like to release maven parent pom r630638 as version 8. A site.xml has
been added in this release.
Source:
, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now the question is do we have to change this order ?.
Have a look at MRESOURCES-39 [1].
Users complains about system properties (-D in the mvn cli) doesn't
win.
IMHO, system props should wins.
This was the case with maven1 [2
My goal is only to help users which need some features in maven.
But if you say/think the feature is bad : No problem I can revert the
commit and mark the jira issue as won't fix.
--
Olivier
2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 22-Feb-08, at 2:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vincent Massol asked it for cargo build.
--
Olivier
2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 24-Feb-08, at 10:57 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
My goal is only to help users which need some features in maven.
But if you say/think the feature is bad : No problem I can revert
2008/2/24, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Olivier,
Please for the love of god, would you please be more careful. You're
just ripping through all sorts of plugins making major behavioral
changes in core fundamental plugins? How do you know changing the way
properties are ordered isn't
1 - 100 of 2872 matches
Mail list logo