Hi all,
I wrote some test code that was trying to drain a process::Queue. This ended up
losing values from the queue, as demonstrated by:
TEST(QueueTest, Discard)
{
Queue q;
Future get = q.get();
EXPECT_FALSE(get.isReady());
get.discard();
EXPECT_TRUE(get.hasDiscard());
q.put(42);
+1
> On 13 Dec 2015, at 19:46, Michael Park wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In the C++ world, the *void* parameter is considered to be only there for C
> compatibility reasons.
>
> We do a good job of not using *void *parameters in function declarations,
> e.g., *void F();*. On the other hand, we're *no
