Re: Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Marco Massenzio
+10 for consistency +1 for hyphens (less carpal-tunnel :) -- *Marco Massenzio* http://codetrips.com On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Michael Park wrote: > +1 for consistency, +1 for hyphens for executables. > > On 11 February 2016 at 14:25, Kevin Klues

Re: Reorganize 3rdparty directory

2016-02-11 Thread Marco Massenzio
This is a great initiative and something I wanted to do since the first day I did `git clone` for Mesos :) Happy to help wherever I can, Kapil - just say the word! In my opinion, we should take full advantage of git submodules and move stout/libprocess out into their own repositories (which,

Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Vinod Kone
Some the scripts in the "support" directory have dashes ("-") in their names (e.g., apply-review.sh, apply-reviews.py), whereas some have underscores ("_") (e.g., docker_build.sh, mesos_split.py). This is really confusing and we should stick with one style. I propose to change all them to use

Announcing MesosCon North America 2016

2016-02-11 Thread Kiersten Gaffney
Hello all, We’re excited to announce that MesosCon North America 2016 will be held in Denver, CO on June 1-2, 2016. MesosCon is a community-driven conference, organized for the Apache Mesos community. Talk submissions, sponsorship opportunities, and early-bird registration are now open for the

Shepherd for MESOS-3486

2016-02-11 Thread Michael Browning
Hello, I've picked a small issue off of the newbie issues stack to get started with: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3486 ...and I've commented on the issue with a proposed solution, and am now looking for a shepherd on this one. Thank you, Michael

Re: Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Kevin Klues
I prefer hyphens as well On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Jojy Varghese wrote: > hyphen++. Is google friendly apparently. Also less keys to press :) > > -Jojy > > > >> On Feb 11, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Greg Mann wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016

Re: Slave Terminology Rename Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread Vinod Kone
What do you mean by keeping the old symbols? For example, in the case of the `Allocator::addSlave()`, are you suggesting that when we add `Allocator::addAgent()`, we keep `Allocator::addSlave()` as well? Master will only call `Allocator::addAgent()` from that point onward, so I'm not sure what's

Re: Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Michael Park
+1 for consistency, +1 for hyphens for executables. On 11 February 2016 at 14:25, Kevin Klues wrote: > I typically think of files having dashes as binaries or scripts that > are runnable, whereas files with underscores are meant as source or > otherwise supplementary to the

Re: Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Greg Mann
+1 On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Vinod Kone wrote: > Some the scripts in the "support" directory have dashes ("-") in their > names (e.g., apply-review.sh, apply-reviews.py), whereas some have > underscores ("_") (e.g., docker_build.sh, mesos_split.py). > > This is

Re: Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Kevin Klues
I typically think of files having dashes as binaries or scripts that are runnable, whereas files with underscores are meant as source or otherwise supplementary to the binary produced (e.g. a supplementary python library that the main python program imports). I'm not sure where I inherited this

Re: Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Jojy Varghese
hyphen++. Is google friendly apparently. Also less keys to press :) -Jojy > On Feb 11, 2016, at 12:43 PM, Greg Mann wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Vinod Kone wrote: > >> Some the scripts in the "support" directory have

Re: Inconsistent naming of support scripts

2016-02-11 Thread Vinod Kone
Why hyphens? Most of the files in our repo use underscores. I would like us to be consistent on how we name files in the repo. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Kevin Klues wrote: > I prefer hyphens as well > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Jojy Varghese

Re: Slave Terminology Rename Proposal

2016-02-11 Thread James Peach
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Diana J Arroyo wrote: > > > > Hello Everyone, > > The initial proposal for the slave to agent rename has been added to the > Epic JIRA item: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-1478 for your > review. The link to the proposal working