---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/#review56909
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26798]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/
---
(Updated Oct. 16, 2014, 5:17 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
On Oct. 16, 2014, 5:36 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
support/apply-review.sh, line 20
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/diff/1/?file=722887#file722887line20
Update usage?
Cody Maloney wrote:
I was explicitly leaving it out because process wise committers should
look at the diff
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/#review56980
---
Patch looks great!
Reviews applied: [26798]
All tests passed.
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/
---
(Updated Oct. 16, 2014, 5:36 a.m.)
Review request for mesos and Vinod Kone.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/#review56894
---
Ship it!
support/apply-review.sh
On Oct. 16, 2014, 5:36 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
support/apply-review.sh, line 20
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/diff/1/?file=722887#file722887line20
Update usage?
I was explicitly leaving it out because process wise committers should look at
the diff before they commit it. Not
On Oct. 16, 2014, 5:36 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
support/apply-review.sh, line 20
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26798/diff/1/?file=722887#file722887line20
Update usage?
Cody Maloney wrote:
I was explicitly leaving it out because process wise committers should
look at the diff