On Nov. 11, 2014, 3:17 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Can you expand a little bit on why you needed a new async watcher? Maybe
add it to the review request description :-)
Joris Van Remoortere wrote:
The point of this new async watcher is to start to separate out the 3
concepts that
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/
---
(Updated Nov. 14, 2014, 10:51 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/
---
(Updated Nov. 14, 2014, 11:17 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/#review61595
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Niklas Nielsen
On Nov. 14, 2014, 3:17 p.m.,
On Nov. 11, 2014, 11:17 p.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
Can you expand a little bit on why you needed a new async watcher? Maybe
add it to the review request description :-)
The point of this new async watcher is to start to separate out the 3 concepts
that currently use the same event loop:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/
---
(Updated Nov. 11, 2014, 4:53 p.m.)
Review request for mesos, Ben Mahler, Jie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27502/#review60883
---
Can you expand a little bit on why you needed a new async watcher?
