Re: Review Request 32507: Moved REGISTER and REREGISTER out of scheduler Calls.

2015-04-03 Thread Vinod Kone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32507/ --- (Updated April 3, 2015, 11:47 p.m.) Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.

Re: Review Request 32507: Moved REGISTER and REREGISTER out of scheduler Calls.

2015-04-03 Thread Vinod Kone
On March 31, 2015, 10:51 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: Instead of having a separate /scheduler/events endpoint with a top level Subscribe protobuf, could we just have one /scheduler/call endpoint and have a SUBSCRIBE Call? I prefer this because: (1) There is a single endpoint / Call

Re: Review Request 32507: Moved REGISTER and REREGISTER out of scheduler Calls.

2015-03-31 Thread Ben Mahler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32507/#review78423 --- Instead of having a separate /scheduler/events endpoint with a top

Re: Review Request 32507: Moved REGISTER and REREGISTER out of scheduler Calls.

2015-03-30 Thread Vinod Kone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32507/ --- (Updated March 31, 2015, 12:10 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.

Re: Review Request 32507: Moved REGISTER and REREGISTER out of scheduler Calls.

2015-03-26 Thread Vinod Kone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32507/ --- (Updated March 27, 2015, 12:05 a.m.) Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.

Review Request 32507: Moved REGISTER and REREGISTER out of scheduler Calls.

2015-03-25 Thread Vinod Kone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32507/ --- Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler. Bugs: MESOs-1127