On April 20, 2015, 10:46 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/master/master.cpp, line 2736
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32843/diff/2/?file=936875#file936875line2736
It looks like we can do this without having the extra `killTask`
method: just have this convert to the `Kill` `Call` and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32843/
---
(Updated April 21, 2015, 10:57 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32843/#review80990
---
Ship it!
Modulo Ben's comments.
- Alexander Rukletsov
On April
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32843/
---
(Updated April 20, 2015, 8:02 p.m.)
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
On April 8, 2015, 5:52 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
I'm still not sure whether it's necessary to provide `SlaveID` in the kill
request. But I'd better comment on MESOS-1127 instead.
made SlaveID optional like we did for Reconcile for backwards compatibility.
- Vinod
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32843/#review79373
---
I'm still not sure whether it's necessary to provide `SlaveID` in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/32843/
---
Review request for mesos and Ben Mahler.
Bugs: MESOS-1127
