[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

I think we can conclude that the VOTE should end. The release candidate was rejected because of the bug raised in METAMODEL-204. I'll delete the staged release and the git tag etc. Kasper 2015-10-26 17:41 GMT+01:00 Kasper Sørensen : > I've raised this bug for it: > https://issues.apache.org/jir

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

-1 Alberto Rodríguez Vía de las Dos Castillas, 33, Ática 4, 3ª Planta. 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid Tel: +34 91 352 59 42 // *@stratiobd * 2015-10-26 17:41 GMT+01:00 Kasper Sørensen : > I've raised this bug for it: > https://issues.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

I've raised this bug for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-204 And also posted this PR for the resolution of the bug: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/66 2015-10-26 17:21 GMT+01:00 Du Krøger, Dennis < dennis.dukro...@humaninference.com>: > Ouch! -1 it is, then > > -O

[GitHub] metamodel pull request: METAMODEL-204: Fixed

GitHub user kaspersorensen opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/66 METAMODEL-204: Fixed My attempt at fixing METAMODEL-204 which unfortunately seemed to block the release of MetaModel 4.4.1. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running

[jira] [Commented] (METAMODEL-204) JDBC module does not rewrite newly introduced "APPROXIMATE" keyword

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14974513#comment-14974513 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METAMODEL-204: -- GitHub user kaspersorensen opened

[jira] [Created] (METAMODEL-204) JDBC module does not rewrite newly introduced "APPROXIMATE" keyword

Kasper Sørensen created METAMODEL-204: - Summary: JDBC module does not rewrite newly introduced "APPROXIMATE" keyword Key: METAMODEL-204 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-204 Pro

RE: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

Ouch! -1 it is, then -Original Message- From: Kasper Sørensen [mailto:i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com] Sent: 26. oktober 2015 17:20 To: dev@metamodel.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1 -1 Changing my vote to -1 because ... We just tried to apply the staged rel

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

-1 Changing my vote to -1 because ... We just tried to apply the staged release candidate on DataCleaner and from there we discovered a quite serious bug. Let me explain (and report in JIRA shortly): The change we did to support APPROXIMATE keyword somehow does not get rewritten properly in the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

+1 Pozdrawiam / Regards / Med venlig hilsen Tomasz Guziałek 2015-10-26 15:10 GMT+01:00 Alberto Rodriguez : > +1 > > Alberto Rodríguez > > > > Vía de las Dos Castillas, 33, Ática 4, 3ª Planta. > 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid > Tel: +34 91 352 59 42 // *@stratiobd

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

+1 Den 26/10/2015 3.11 PM skrev "Alberto Rodriguez" : > +1 > > Alberto Rodríguez > > > > Vía de las Dos Castillas, 33, Ática 4, 3ª Planta. > 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid > Tel: +34 91 352 59 42 // *@stratiobd * > > 2015-10-26 14:50 GMT+0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

+1 Alberto Rodríguez Vía de las Dos Castillas, 33, Ática 4, 3ª Planta. 28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid Tel: +34 91 352 59 42 // *@stratiobd * 2015-10-26 14:50 GMT+01:00 Pesu, Claudia : > +1 > > > On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Kasper Sør

Re: Query on PojoContext seems to be too slow

Hi Alessandro, I'm not immediately sure why this might be taking that long. Can you share an example query that you use? I wouldn't expect POJO datacontext to ever be the fastest implementation. It's mostly just a convenient thing to use for testing etc. where the footprint is very very small. I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

+1 > On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Kasper Sørensen > wrote: > > Hi All, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel > version 4.4.1. > > The Git tag to be voted on is MetaModel-4.4.1: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=metamodel.git;a=commit;h=424e918fdb0

RE: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

+1 -Original Message- From: Kasper Sørensen [mailto:i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com] Sent: 26. oktober 2015 14:43 To: dev@metamodel.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1 Hi All, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel version 4.4.1. The

[VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 4.4.1

Hi All, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel version 4.4.1. The Git tag to be voted on is MetaModel-4.4.1: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=metamodel.git;a=commit;h=424e918fdb08475b3dbf784ffba00be53b7675e3 The source artifact to be voted on is: http://rep

Query on PojoContext seems to be too slow

Dear all, I'm trying to implement MetaModel as component to allows aggregation and filtering on a Pojo object used in out project as data store. My first integration does something like the following code snippet: /SimpleTableDef dataStoreDef = new SimpleTableDef(uniqueTableName, columnNames,

Re: Discussion | Any release plans ?

OK I will stage a release. 2015-10-26 8:59 GMT+01:00 Alberto Rodriguez : > I think the changes made last week do justify a new release. > > I'd go ahead. > > Kind regards, > > Alberto > > 2015-10-25 17:17 GMT+01:00 Ankit Kumar : > > > +1 > > > > Regards > > Ankit > > > > > On 25 Oct 2015, at 16:1

[jira] [Resolved] (METAMODEL-203) Upgrade MongoDB dependency to version 3.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kasper Sørensen resolved METAMODEL-203. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 4.4.1 > Upgrade MongoDB dependency to versi

[jira] [Commented] (METAMODEL-203) Upgrade MongoDB dependency to version 3.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14973979#comment-14973979 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METAMODEL-203: -- Github user asfgit closed the pull

[GitHub] metamodel pull request: Upgraded to MongoDB 3.x

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/64 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[jira] [Created] (METAMODEL-203) Upgrade MongoDB dependency to version 3.x

Kasper Sørensen created METAMODEL-203: - Summary: Upgrade MongoDB dependency to version 3.x Key: METAMODEL-203 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-203 Project: Apache MetaModel

[GitHub] metamodel pull request: Minor build improvements

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/65 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] metamodel pull request: Minor build improvements

Github user LosD commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/65#issuecomment-151058417 Travis is happy, and container-based Travis start up faster than the standard infrastructure , so :+1: --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

Re: Discussion | Any release plans ?

I think the changes made last week do justify a new release. I'd go ahead. Kind regards, Alberto 2015-10-25 17:17 GMT+01:00 Ankit Kumar : > +1 > > Regards > Ankit > > > On 25 Oct 2015, at 16:19, Kasper Sørensen < > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Maybe we should

[jira] [Created] (METAMODEL-202) Improve integration testing via Travis services/databases

Kasper Sørensen created METAMODEL-202: - Summary: Improve integration testing via Travis services/databases Key: METAMODEL-202 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METAMODEL-202 Project: Apach

[GitHub] metamodel pull request: Upgraded to MongoDB 3.x

Github user LosD commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/64#issuecomment-151052920 LGTM! :+1: --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature ena