Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/143
I didn't test, but code LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
GitHub user kaspersorensen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/144
METAMODEL-1139: Use Java 8 functions instead of our own Ref, Action and
Func types
This time the same as #142 but now with an official issue number
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Github user kaspersorensen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/141
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user kaspersorensen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/142
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
GitHub user davkrause opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/143
Allowed for securityToken-free use of salesforce
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davkrause/metamodel
salesforce-without-se
Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/142
I'm gonna take that as a go-ahead. But thinking about it a bit more, I
guess it shouldn't be merged to master, but rather the `5.x` branch since this
is going to require Java 8.
I'
Github user LosD commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/142
Haven't checked line-by-line, but approach LGTM, and happy to see standard
classes replacing our own.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
