Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.3.3

Looking at the result, it seems that even though I initiated the vote, I forgot to vote myself, which would have pushed it to 3 binding votes. Op di 11 mei 2021 om 11:50 schreef Kasper Sørensen : > > Thank you for pointing that out Justin. That's definitely something for us > to be aware of.

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.3.3

> > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Lútzen Luinenburg > > > Product Manager > > > > > > > > > T+31 (0)26 355 06 55 > > > > > > M

[VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.3.3

Hi All, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel version 5.3.3. The Git tag to be voted on is MetaModel-5.3.3: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=metamodel.git;a=commit;h=705d9fe37d2792ee5ef161ae4778ab8962aa8168 The source artifact to be voted on is:

New MetaModel release.

Hi, I'd like to create a new MetaModel release (5.3.3?) (preferably after https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/247 is merged). Is that okay? Kind Regards, Arjan Seijkens

Re: Migration of project website from Apache CMS

you use to build sites on github > > pages, too. So my preference is slightly towards Jekyll. > > > > Den tir. 25. aug. 2020 kl. 15.54 skrev Arjan Seijkens Hagemans < > > arja...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Since our project we

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache MetaModel website migration target environment

Hi everyone, I'm happy to be able to tell that the VOTE for the Apache MetaModel website migration target environment has passed with 3 votes (all binding). The result is that 3 votes were for migrating to Jekyll. Voters: Kasper Sørensen * Alberto Rodriguez * Arjan Seijkens * * - indicates PMC

Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel website migration target environment

+1 Jekyll Op do 3 sep. 2020 om 20:16 schreef Alberto Rodriguez : > > +1 Jekyll > > El jue., 3 sept. 2020 19:23, Kasper Sørensen > escribió: > > > +1 Jekyll > > > > > > Den tor. 3. sep. 2020 kl. 14.58 skrev Arjan Seijkens Hagemans < > > arja...@

[VOTE] Apache MetaModel website migration target environment

Hi All, Since our project website is still running on Apache CMS and that has reached end-of-life, we need to migrate. These pages describe some options for the migration: https://infra.apache.org/project-site.html

Migration of project website from Apache CMS

Hi, Since our project website is still running on Apache CMS and that has reached end-of-life, we need to migrate. These pages describe some options for the migration: https://infra.apache.org/project-site.html

Re: Your project's website

I think they still need a point-of-contact for the migration. I could do that if desired. Kind regards, Arjan Seijkens Op ma 10 aug. 2020 om 20:05 schreef Kasper Sørensen : > > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for reaching out. Yes, our website is using the Apache CMS. However, > we only use it to host

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Metamodel release 5.3.2

regards, Arjan Seijkens Op ma 6 jan. 2020 om 09:24 schreef Arjan Seijkens Hagemans : > > +1 > > Op ma 6 jan. 2020 om 08:58 schreef Dennis Krøger : > > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Arjan Seijkens Hagemans > > wrote: > > > > > H

Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.3.2

+1 Op ma 6 jan. 2020 om 08:58 schreef Dennis Krøger : > > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 10:41 AM Arjan Seijkens Hagemans > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel > > version 5.3.2. > > &

[VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.3.2

Hi All, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel version 5.3.2. The Git tag to be voted on is MetaModel-5.3.2: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=metamodel.git;a=commit;h=ec4cd25d6e21d6eb85cc42ca4ba805e0e383488b The source artifact to be voted on is:

Re: [GitHub] [metamodel] arjansh opened a new pull request #229: Upgrade to Elasticsearch 7.3.1

Hi, I created this pull request last week Wednesday, can someone maybe give some feedback on it? Kind regards, Arjan Seijkens

Re: Time for a release? Call for release engineers...

ed. > > How did you find the release guide? Was anything missing or inaccurate? > > Den ons. 21. aug. 2019 kl. 08.20 skrev Kasper Sørensen < > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com>: > > > I'm looking into it, hang on. > > > > Den tir. 20. aug. 2019 kl. 13.02 skrev

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Metamodel 5.3.1

regards, Arjan Seijkens Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 09:31 schreef Arjan Seijkens Hagemans : > > +1 > > Op wo 11 sep. 2019 om 21:40 schreef Dennis Krøger : > > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, 16:35 Kasper Sørensen, > > wrote: > > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.3.1

. 9. sep. 2019 kl. 10.24 skrev Lutzen Luinenburg < > > > l.luinenb...@humaninference.com>: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> > > >> Kind regards, > > >> > > >> Lútzen Luinenburg > > >> Product Deve

[VOTE] Apache MetaModel release 5.3.1

Hi All, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Metamodel version 5.3.1. The Git tag to be voted on is MetaModel-5.3.1: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=metamodel.git;a=commit;h=1c6ab1fdb8f53415b86df05c9ed09b380b9eef61 The source artifact to be voted on is:

Re: Time for a release? Call for release engineers...

? Op di 20 aug. 2019 om 09:28 schreef Arjan Seijkens Hagemans < arja...@gmail.com>: > I'll just start with it and let you know if I encounter any problems. > > Op ma 19 aug. 2019 om 16:33 schreef Kasper Sørensen < > i.am.kasper.soren...@gmail.com>: > >> Perfect

Re: Time for a release? Call for release engineers...

far as I can tell it is pretty complete. Can you skim through it and > let me know what you think? Or just begin if you think it's looking good! > :-) > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METAMODEL/Release+guide > > Den man. 19. aug. 2019 kl. 09.30 skrev Arjan Sei

RE: Time for a release? Call for release engineers...

Hi Kasper, I would be willing to do/try this. Kind regards, Arjan Seijkens -Original Message- From: Kasper Sørensen Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 10:00 PM To: dev@metamodel.apache.org Subject: Time for a release? Call for release engineers... Hi all, I think we're