Re: [DISCUSS] parser ES + Solr schema abstraction

2018-05-23 Thread Otto Fowler
I think we are on the same page On May 23, 2018 at 14:00:25, Simon Elliston Ball ( si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote: There is certainly a lot of value in the idea of tagging the data with a config version of some sort for traceability. This is probably a per topology it goes through thing

Re: [DISCUSS] parser ES + Solr schema abstraction

2018-05-23 Thread Simon Elliston Ball
There is certainly a lot of value in the idea of tagging the data with a config version of some sort for traceability. This is probably a per topology it goes through thing that gives us detailed lineage. Maybe something like the NiFi provenance approach and a link to a lineage store like atlas

Re: [DISCUSS] parser ES + Solr schema abstraction

2018-05-22 Thread Otto Fowler
I’ve also talked with J. Zeolla conceptually storing data in hdfs relative to the version of the schema to produced it, but that may not matter…. So Simon, do you mean that as part of taking a configuration change ( either startup or live while running ) we ‘update’ the metadata/schema, or