GitHub user kylerichardson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/302
METRON-492 Run metron_common build check as local_action
When testing various deployment options, noticed the logic for the
metron_common role didn't work as expected. Updated to
Github user kylerichardson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/276#discussion_r82490277
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-parsers/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/parsers/utils/SyslogUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+/**
+
Github user kylerichardson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/276#discussion_r82489921
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-parsers/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/parsers/utils/SyslogUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+/**
+
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/289
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/294
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/292
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Hi James,
My apologies for missing/forgetting about those threads. It looks like you guys
are doing the right thing.
-Taylor
> On Oct 6, 2016, at 10:11 PM, James Sirota wrote:
>
> Hi Taylor,
>
> We setup a recurring demo meeting to run twice a month last month per this
GitHub user nickwallen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/301
METRON-490 Stellar Validation of Required Parameters
### [METRON-490](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-490)
Currently, each Stellar function handles validation of
Github user james-sirota commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/298
this is a fairly minor change, but makes sense. +1 builds, passes tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user james-sirota commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/276#discussion_r82446542
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/Constants.java
---
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
Github user james-sirota commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/292
+1 by inspection. thanks for catching this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user james-sirota commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/295
+1 by inspection
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user james-sirota commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/297
Does the same apply to other parsers as well? or just snort?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user james-sirota commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/300#discussion_r82441035
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/dsl/functions/NetworkFunctions.java
---
@@ -78,13 +78,16 @@
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/299
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/299
+1, I'm satisfied updating the docs and the unit test addresses the
original concern seen.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user danieljue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/278
Roger that, will devise a test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/275
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/275
This one is good to go. Thank you for the contribution! ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
I've been working with the Ambari Mpack on a live cluster over the past
couple days. Realizing that we're in the very early iterations and need
some time to polish up the rough edges, I am very impressed with the work
that has been done so far. The user experience is light years beyond our
Github user justinleet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/299
To validate Casey's point, I just ran a quickly modified version of your
unit test with things single quotes, and things seem to line up quite nicely at
that point on special chars and
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/300#discussion_r82378741
--- Diff:
metron-platform/metron-common/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/common/dsl/functions/NetworkFunctions.java
---
@@ -78,13 +78,16 @@
Whether it is explicit or implicit, I think that would be one of the major
benefits of having the expressiveness of a DSL. I can choose to have some
enrichments run in parallel (the split/join that you are referring to) or
have some enrichment runs serially.
Having enrichments run serially is
GitHub user cestella reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/297
METRON-488: Snort should use a proper CSV implementation
Right now if you have a custom snort rule (e.g. alert tcp any any -> any
any (msg:'snort alert message having a ,(comma) to
GitHub user cestella opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/300
METRON-489: RemoveSubdomains Stellar Function behaves incorrectly for some
domains
com.com throws an exception
www.subdomain.com.com returns subdomain.com
Unsure if other
25 matches
Mail list logo