Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-31 Thread Michael Miklavcic
All, unless there are any objections, for now it might be best to keep the status quo and circle back around to modifying this dependency at a later time. While not ideal, it does not appear to currently violate any licensing rules. Best, Mike On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Billie Rinaldi

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-31 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Michael Miklavcic < michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Billie, > > Thanks for the feedback and info. I'm working on resolving this over the > next couple of days and could use some additional guidance when you have a > moment. > > You mention building the

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-31 Thread Michael Miklavcic
My reservation with this approach is that we're still depending on an unreleased version of files from a github repo that we do not control. So if Kraken or OpenSOC pull their repos, then this no longer works. The 2 approaches outlined above mitigate this risk as follows: 1. Once published to

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-31 Thread JJ Meyer
Mike, You wouldn't need to necessarily download the code and host it in the metron repo. Git sub-modules are sometimes used in cases like this. It is more like a pointer to an external repo. Below is a short read on how we could potentially do this with git sub-modules. I have used these in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-31 Thread Michael Miklavcic
Hi Billie, Thanks for the feedback and info. I'm working on resolving this over the next couple of days and could use some additional guidance when you have a moment. You mention building the Kraken code as part of Metron. So I could literally pull down the full source, plop it in a new Maven

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-17 Thread Billie Rinaldi
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put it under > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/metron/ , perhaps as > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/metron/mvn-repo ? > No, we could only do

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-13 Thread JJ Meyer
Has anyone used git's sub-modules before? My understanding is you just point to an external repository. So *technically* I do not think the code would be hosted in the main repo. Even if that was allowed, I have concerns about how inactive the repo is. Could we fork this, make our changes, and

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-13 Thread Matt Foley
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to put it under https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/metron/ , perhaps as https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/metron/mvn-repo ? We should not host anything with a license that isn’t compatible with inclusion in an Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-13 Thread Billie Rinaldi
No, we can't host artifacts in a git repo, or on a website. It would be like distributing a release that hasn't been voted upon. Regarding message threading, in Gmail adding a [tag] to the subject does not create a new thread. So the change is not visible in my mailbox unless the rest of the

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-11 Thread Michael Miklavcic
Ok, that was funny On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Casey Stella <ceste...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd recommend restarting this discuss thread with the subject > "[DISCUSS][MENTORS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git > repo". That's the Mentors bat

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-11 Thread Casey Stella
I'd recommend restarting this discuss thread with the subject "[DISCUSS][MENTORS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo". That's the Mentors bat-symbol. The other option is to repeat "mentors" 3 times and either the mentors will appear or you wil

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-11 Thread Michael Miklavcic
Any comment from the mentors on this? On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Michael Miklavcic < michael.miklav...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a question primarily for the mentors. > > *Background* > metron-common is currently depending on the openSOC github repo for > hosting kraken artifacts. The

Re: [DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-09 Thread Otto Fowler
Just a heads up and hopefully not a distraction: Per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-583, if we ever update to a never version of GROK, many of our existing rules are going to break. I have a pull request out for this issue (  https://github.com/thekrakken/java-grok/pull/60 ) with

[DISCUSS] Hosting Kraken maven artifacts in incubator-metron git repo

2017-01-09 Thread Michael Miklavcic
This is a question primarily for the mentors. *Background* metron-common is currently depending on the openSOC github repo for hosting kraken artifacts. The original reason for this was that these jars are not hosted in Maven Central, and they were not reliably available in the Kraken repo.