Re: [DISCUSS] SIDELOADING PARSERS: Packaging and Loading and Extensions [oh.my]

Sounds like a great proposal. Im excited to see what you come up with. james 14.03.2017, 19:56, "Otto Fowler" : > RE: questions - > > - The archetype will produce NARs so having it with the VFSClassloader > doesn’t work, unless > I do an archetype without nars, but that

Re: [DISCUSS] SIDELOADING PARSERS: Packaging and Loading and Extensions [oh.my]

RE: questions - - The archetype will produce NARs so having it with the VFSClassloader doesn’t work, unless I do an archetype without nars, but that would be so short lived I wouldn’t bother. - My goal is to do it in such a way that I could propose / submit the changes made back to nifi ( worse

Re: [DISCUSS] SIDELOADING PARSERS: Packaging and Loading and Extensions [oh.my]

I like the direction of using NAR. The key benefits I see (there are others, but I picked by favorites): 1. Move away from the uber jars in Storm. Granted, this should be possible with modifications from the new Stellar classloader. My hope is that this would allow us to stop shading the parser

Re: [DISCUSS] SIDELOADING PARSERS: Packaging and Loading and Extensions [oh.my]

I would definitely agree that moving forward we should consider something like Nar for Stellar. I'm not seeing the need for parsers exactly. I don't want to squash the forward thinking aspect here; we should be broad and think about the end, ideal state. I just want to make sure we think

Re: [DISCUSS] SIDELOADING PARSERS: Packaging and Loading and Extensions [oh.my]

"The Apache NiFi NAR ‘system’ allows for the packaging and loading of java resources with classloader isolation. Although technically it is the Service Provider api that makes the ‘plugins’ part of the system, you can view them together, and thus look at the NAR features as a system to create,

Re: [DISCUSS] SIDELOADING PARSERS: Packaging and Loading and Extensions [oh.my]

I like the approach. I think Nar constitutes a production-quality existing solution meeting highly similar needs to Metron’s. Just a ‘btw’ regarding Joe’s input that I transmitted: - Joe made clear that he was only giving his personal opinion, since of course no individual can speak for the